[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60219d61-a39c-554f-af71-07cf7e6c40b0@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 16:02:25 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Smitha T Murthy <smitha.t@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: m.szyprowski@...sung.com, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
mchehab@...nel.org, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar, jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com, stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org,
dillon.minfei@...il.com, david.plowman@...pberrypi.com,
mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
andi@...zian.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
aswani.reddy@...sung.com, pankaj.dubey@...sung.com,
linux-fsd@...la.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/20] arm64: dts: fsd: Add MFC related DT enteries
On 17/05/2022 14:55, Smitha T Murthy wrote:
> Add MFC DT node and reserve memory node for MFC usage.
>
> Cc: linux-fsd@...la.com
> Signed-off-by: Smitha T Murthy <smitha.t@...sung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts | 8 ++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd.dtsi | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts
> index 5af560c1b5e6..36f6b013ce99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts
> @@ -37,3 +37,11 @@
> &serial_0 {
> status = "okay";
> };
> +
> +&clock_mfc {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&mfc_0 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
Labels are ordered by name.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd.dtsi
> index 9a652abcbcac..434ae75421d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd.dtsi
> @@ -249,6 +249,18 @@
> #clock-cells = <0>;
> };
>
> + reserved-memory {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + mfc_left: region@...00000 {
> + compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> + no-map;
> + reg = <0 0x84000000 0 0x8000000>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> soc: soc@0 {
> compatible = "simple-bus";
> #address-cells = <2>;
> @@ -748,6 +760,16 @@
> clocks = <&fin_pll>, <&clock_imem IMEM_MCT_PCLK>;
> clock-names = "fin_pll", "mct";
> };
> +
> + mfc_0: mfc0@...80000 {
Generic node names, so mfc.
> + compatible = "samsung,mfc-v12";
> + reg = <0x0 0x12880000 0x0 0x10000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 137 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clock-names = "mfc";
> + clocks = <&clock_mfc MFC_MFC_IPCLKPORT_ACLK>;
> + memory-region = <&mfc_left>;
> + status = "disabled";
Why exactly this is disabled? Usually we disable nodes which needs
resources from the boards, but this is not the case here. Unless it is?
> + };
> };
> };
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists