lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220517143047.3054498-1-jannh@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 16:30:47 +0200
From:   Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To:     Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] s390/crypto: fix scatterwalk_unmap() callers in AES-GCM

The argument of scatterwalk_unmap() is supposed to be the void* that was
returned by the previous scatterwalk_map() call.
The s390 AES-GCM implementation was instead passing the pointer to the
struct scatter_walk.

This doesn't actually break anything because scatterwalk_unmap() only uses
its argument under CONFIG_HIGHMEM and ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP.

Note that I have not tested this patch in any way, not even compile-tested
it.

Fixes: bf7fa038707c ("s390/crypto: add s390 platform specific aes gcm support.")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
---
IDK which tree this has to go through - s390 or crypto?
maybe s390 is better, since they can actually test it?

 arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c
index 54c7536f2482..1023e9d43d44 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static inline void _gcm_sg_unmap_and_advance(struct gcm_sg_walk *gw,
 					     unsigned int nbytes)
 {
 	gw->walk_bytes_remain -= nbytes;
-	scatterwalk_unmap(&gw->walk);
+	scatterwalk_unmap(gw->walk_ptr);
 	scatterwalk_advance(&gw->walk, nbytes);
 	scatterwalk_done(&gw->walk, 0, gw->walk_bytes_remain);
 	gw->walk_ptr = NULL;
@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ static int gcm_out_walk_go(struct gcm_sg_walk *gw, unsigned int minbytesneeded)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	scatterwalk_unmap(&gw->walk);
+	scatterwalk_unmap(gw->walk_ptr);
 	gw->walk_ptr = NULL;
 
 	gw->ptr = gw->buf;

base-commit: 42226c989789d8da4af1de0c31070c96726d990c
-- 
2.36.0.550.gb090851708-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ