[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YoPngQEY3az9J+AB@zx2c4.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 20:20:49 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>,
David Gstir <david@...ma-star.at>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
John Ernberg <john.ernberg@...ia.se>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jan Luebbe <j.luebbe@...gutronix.de>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Franck LENORMAND <franck.lenormand@....com>,
Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] KEYS: trusted: allow use of kernel RNG for key
material
Hi Jarkko,
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 09:10:57PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 19:27 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 04:57:00PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > > + trusted.rng= [KEYS]
> > > + Format: <string>
> > > + The RNG used to generate key material for trusted keys.
> > > + Can be one of:
> > > + - "kernel"
> > > + - the same value as trusted.source: "tpm" or "tee"
> > > + - "default"
> > > + If not specified, "default" is used. In this case,
> > > + the RNG's choice is left to each individual trust source.
> > > +
> >
> > As a general mechanism, I object to this. The kernel's RNG must be
> > trusted in the first place for key material. That's the whole point of
> > it.
>
> I would relax this a bit: kernel's RNG must be implicitly must be
Sorry, I didn't mean to seem unrelaxed. What I meant was that as a
general mechanism, it doesn't make sense, but it isn't a general
mechanism, it's a particular one for trusted_keys, which led me to
question why it seemed to have such a general name like "trusted.rng".
Ahmad pointed out that the trusted prefix actually isn't general. It's
what trusted_keys compiles its module as. So just a misunderstanding. It
appears to be a module param after all. Sorry for the noise!
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists