[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28686e8d994c297a78fb816805cd3652a8f8c90a.camel@mniewoehner.de>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 20:25:43 +0200
From: Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: utils: include UUID in _DSM evaluation warning
On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 16:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 7:25 PM Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > The _DSM evaluation warning in its current form is not very helpful, as
> > it lacks any specific information:
> > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM (0x1001)
> >
> > Thus, include the UUID of the missing _DSM:
> > ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-... (0x1001)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/utils.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> > index d5cedffeeff9..7da993f5b6c3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> > @@ -681,7 +681,8 @@ acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t
> > *guid,
> > u64 rev, u64 func,
> >
> > if (ret != AE_NOT_FOUND)
> > acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> > - "failed to evaluate _DSM (0x%x)\n", ret);
> > + "failed to evaluate _DSM %pUb (0x%x)\n",
> > + ret, guid);
>
> Shouldn't this be "guid, ret" ?
Ouch, yes ofc.
> Also, don't you want to print the
> value of the GUID rather than the address of its location?
Not sure what you mean tbh. Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst states
%pUb being the right format. lib/test_printf.c implements it that way, too.
>
> And I don't think you need to break the line here.
>
> >
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists