linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] cpufreq: Abort show/store for half initialized policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gzYQJ+j2M64ct68ghOCmffdoeakh=FPwRv2DTe1mwbFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 21:40:51 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] cpufreq: Abort show/store for half initialized policy

On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 12:25 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 May 2022 at 04:03, Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > If policy initialization fails after the sysfs files are created,
> > there is a possibility that we may end up running show()/store()
> > callbacks for half initialized policies, which may have unpredictable
> > outcomes.
> >
> > Abort show/store in such a case by making sure the policy is active.
> > Also inactivate the policy on such failures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

Applied along with the [2/2], with some adjustments in the subject and
changelog, as 5.19 material.

Thanks!