linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kunit: tool: Use qemu-system-i386 for i386 runs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFd5g47zzgs8eWU44aboYcUVtiQAoFFioNuTvRTMwGgOg0a8ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 16:38:55 -0400
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: tool: Use qemu-system-i386 for i386 runs

On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 4:51 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> We're currently using the x86_64 qemu for i386 builds. While this is not
> incorrect, it's probably more sensible to use the i386 one, which will
> at least fail properly if we accidentally were to build a 64-bit kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

A very sensible thing to do! When I was writing this, I probably
copied and pasted the x64_64 qemu config and then forgot to change
everything to i386 - whoops.

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>