lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 15:56:06 -0500
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Remove ipa_fw_mem node on
 trogdor

On 5/17/22 3:06 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Alex Elder (2022-05-17 12:51:34)
>> On 5/17/22 2:33 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> We don't use this carveout on trogdor boards, and having it defined in
>>> the sc7180 SoC file causes an overlap message to be printed at boot.
>>>
>>>    OF: reserved mem: OVERLAP DETECTED!
>>>    memory@...00000 (0x0000000086000000--0x000000008ec00000) overlaps with memory@...00000 (0x000000008b700000--0x000000008b710000)
>>>
>>> Delete the node in the trogdor dtsi file to fix the overlap problem and
>>> remove the error message.'
>>
>> Is the mpss_mem node (which defines 0x86000000-0x8ec00000) correct?
> 
> I think it is. Modem is working for me.
> 
>>
>> You're right, we don't use that memory on Chrome OS, but I just
>> wondered whether the other node might also have a problem.
> 
> What sort of problem are you thinking about?

At some point in the past I think some of these carved out
areas got updated (perhaps on sdm845?).  I.e. they were
wrong, and got corrected later.  Some things worked despite
that.  So the problem, for example, might be that the
mpss region is bigger than it needs to be.

I don't *assume* there's a problem, I was just asking,
and maybe Bjorn or someone else can verify what's right.

I'm done for the day right now; otherwise I'd spend a
little more time trying to track the information down
myself...

					-Alex


>>
>> I don't actually know...  Bjorn, do you?
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ