[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cjJups443_V8062cFWn3XNxGCnjM1FeWU9_AHnJnibjVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 16:31:29 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 22/23] perf tools: Allow system-wide events to keep
their own CPUs
On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 6:35 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Fri, May 13, 2022 at 07:48:40AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > On 12/05/22 21:53, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > I'm not sure if it's intended. I expect it runs on
> > > cpu 0 or one of the given cpus. Or it runs on both
> > > cpus and returns value in half so that the sum is
> > > the same as the original value (from a cpu).
> >
> > I don't know if there is anything wrong with the way
> > we are handling uncore PMUs, except that I don't know
> > if it is documented anywhere.
>
> Good thing about this conversation is that it will result in
> documentation :-)
>
> Thank you guys for having it and detailing it so nicely.
To move things forward,
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
for the patchset. I'll try to cleanup the cpu map propagation
with hybrid events later.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists