[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1481139-9ed6-3e00-e73e-87d4319c614d@csgroup.eu>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 06:44:36 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] Kill the time spent in patch_instruction()
Le 15/05/2022 à 12:28, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:40:17 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> This series reduces by 70% the time required to activate
>> ftrace on an 8xx with CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX.
>>
>> Measure is performed in function ftrace_replace_code() using mftb()
>> around the loop.
>>
>> With the series,
>> - Without CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX, 416000 TB ticks are measured.
>> - With CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX, 546000 TB ticks are measured.
>>
>> [...]
>
> Patches 1, 3 and 4 applied to powerpc/next.
>
> [1/4] powerpc/code-patching: Don't call is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() without CONFIG_MODULES
> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/cb3ac45214c03852430979a43180371a44b74596
> [3/4] powerpc/code-patching: Use jump_label for testing freed initmem
> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/b033767848c4115e486b1a51946de3bee2ac0fa6
> [4/4] powerpc/code-patching: Use jump_label to check if poking_init() is done
> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1751289268ef959db68b0b6f798d904d6403309a
>
Patch 2 was the keystone of this series. What happened to it ?
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists