[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7310d85-4e8e-6b3b-2ec5-3a56bb9babeb@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 08:35:31 +0100
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c)
Hi,
On 16/05/2022 22:22, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On 5/16/22 03:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20220513:
>>
>
> on i386:
>
> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.o
> ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c: In function ‘act_freq_mhz_show’:
> ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c:276:20: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sysfs_gt_attribute_r_max_func’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> u32 actual_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_max_func(dev, attr,
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c: In function ‘boost_freq_mhz_store’:
> ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c:327:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> return sysfs_gt_attribute_w_func(dev, attr,
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c: In function ‘min_freq_mhz_show’:
> ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_sysfs_pm.c:416:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sysfs_gt_attribute_r_min_func’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> u32 min_freq = sysfs_gt_attribute_r_min_func(dev, attr,
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
>
> Full randconfig file is attached.
There is a fix for this in 09708b6d82ef ("drm/i915/gt: Fix build error
without CONFIG_PM") queued up, waiting for the next pull request, which
the plan was to send out next week or so. Is that okay?
Regards,
Tvrtko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists