linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt6795: Add fixed clocks for 32kHz and 26MHz XOs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 10:18:38 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
        martin.botka@...ainline.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, paul.bouchara@...ainline.org,
        kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt6795: Add fixed clocks for
 32kHz and 26MHz XOs

On 17/05/2022 10:14, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:

> Right. If external components are strictly necessary, physically, they're
> still external components and not inside of the SoC, and anything external
> *may* change depending on the (hardware) implementation.
> 
> Anyway - I was wondering if splitting this change in two commits would be
> better to let people understand what's going on... probably it would, as
> that would clearly show both the addition of the 32K/26M clocks and the
> subsequent removal of the other two: I would at this point do that, what
> do you think?

Could help.


Best regards,
Krzysztof