[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <626d3f67-ae15-938d-ae87-e111b83435d0@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 10:18:38 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
martin.botka@...ainline.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, paul.bouchara@...ainline.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt6795: Add fixed clocks for
32kHz and 26MHz XOs
On 17/05/2022 10:14, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Right. If external components are strictly necessary, physically, they're
> still external components and not inside of the SoC, and anything external
> *may* change depending on the (hardware) implementation.
>
> Anyway - I was wondering if splitting this change in two commits would be
> better to let people understand what's going on... probably it would, as
> that would clearly show both the addition of the 32K/26M clocks and the
> subsequent removal of the other two: I would at this point do that, what
> do you think?
Could help.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists