lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YoNnAgDsIWef82is@krava>
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 11:12:34 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To:     Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] bpf_trace: pass array of u64 values in
 kprobe_multi.addrs

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 09:36:47AM +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> With the interface as defined, it is impossible to pass 64-bit kernel
> addresses from a 32-bit userspace process in BPF_LINK_TYPE_KPROBE_MULTI,
> which severly limits the useability of the interface, change the ABI
> to accept an array of u64 values instead of (kernel? user?) longs.
> Interestingly, the rest of the libbpf infrastructure uses 64-bit values
> for kallsyms addresses already, so this patch also eliminates
> the sym_addr cast in tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c:resolve_kprobe_multi_cb().

so the problem is when we have 32bit user sace on 64bit kernel right?

I think we should keep addrs as longs in uapi and have kernel to figure out
if it needs to read u32 or u64, like you did for symbols in previous patch

we'll need to fix also bpf_kprobe_multi_cookie_swap because it assumes
64bit user space pointers

would be gret if we could have selftest for this

thanks,
jirka

> 
> Fixes: 0dcac272540613d4 ("bpf: Add multi kprobe link")
> Fixes: 5117c26e877352bc ("libbpf: Add bpf_link_create support for multi kprobes")
> Fixes: ddc6b04989eb0993 ("libbpf: Add bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts function")
> Fixes: f7a11eeccb111854 ("selftests/bpf: Add kprobe_multi attach test")
> Fixes: 9271a0c7ae7a9147 ("selftests/bpf: Add attach test for bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts")
> Fixes: 2c6401c966ae1fbe ("selftests/bpf: Add kprobe_multi bpf_cookie test")
> Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c                           | 25 ++++++++++++++++++----
>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h                                |  2 +-
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                             |  8 +++----
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h                             |  2 +-
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c  |  2 +-
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c   |  8 +++----
>  6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 9d3028a..30a15b3 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -2454,7 +2454,7 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
>  	void __user *ucookies;
>  	unsigned long *addrs;
>  	u32 flags, cnt, size, cookies_size;
> -	void __user *uaddrs;
> +	u64 __user *uaddrs;
>  	u64 *cookies = NULL;
>  	void __user *usyms;
>  	int err;
> @@ -2486,9 +2486,26 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	if (uaddrs) {
> -		if (copy_from_user(addrs, uaddrs, size)) {
> -			err = -EFAULT;
> -			goto error;
> +		if (sizeof(*addrs) == sizeof(*uaddrs)) {
> +			if (copy_from_user(addrs, uaddrs, size)) {
> +				err = -EFAULT;
> +				goto error;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			u32 i;
> +			u64 addr;
> +
> +			for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> +				if (get_user(addr, uaddrs + i)) {
> +					err = -EFAULT;
> +					goto error;
> +				}
> +				if (addr > ULONG_MAX) {
> +					err = -EINVAL;
> +					goto error;
> +				}
> +				addrs[i] = addr;
> +			}
>  		}
>  	} else {
>  		struct user_syms us;
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> index 2e0d373..da9c6037 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ struct bpf_link_create_opts {
>  			__u32 flags;
>  			__u32 cnt;
>  			const char **syms;
> -			const unsigned long *addrs;
> +			const __u64 *addrs;
>  			const __u64 *cookies;
>  		} kprobe_multi;
>  		struct {
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index ef7f302..35fa9c5 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -10737,7 +10737,7 @@ static bool glob_match(const char *str, const char *pat)
>  
>  struct kprobe_multi_resolve {
>  	const char *pattern;
> -	unsigned long *addrs;
> +	__u64 *addrs;
>  	size_t cap;
>  	size_t cnt;
>  };
> @@ -10752,12 +10752,12 @@ resolve_kprobe_multi_cb(unsigned long long sym_addr, char sym_type,
>  	if (!glob_match(sym_name, res->pattern))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	err = libbpf_ensure_mem((void **) &res->addrs, &res->cap, sizeof(unsigned long),
> +	err = libbpf_ensure_mem((void **) &res->addrs, &res->cap, sizeof(__u64),
>  				res->cnt + 1);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	res->addrs[res->cnt++] = (unsigned long) sym_addr;
> +	res->addrs[res->cnt++] = sym_addr;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -10772,7 +10772,7 @@ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(const struct bpf_program *prog,
>  	};
>  	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
>  	char errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
> -	const unsigned long *addrs;
> +	const __u64 *addrs;
>  	int err, link_fd, prog_fd;
>  	const __u64 *cookies;
>  	const char **syms;
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> index 9e9a3fd..76e171d 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ struct bpf_kprobe_multi_opts {
>  	/* array of function symbols to attach */
>  	const char **syms;
>  	/* array of function addresses to attach */
> -	const unsigned long *addrs;
> +	const __u64 *addrs;
>  	/* array of user-provided values fetchable through bpf_get_attach_cookie */
>  	const __u64 *cookies;
>  	/* number of elements in syms/addrs/cookies arrays */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
> index 83ef55e3..e843840 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static void kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest(void)
>  	cookies[6] = 7;
>  	cookies[7] = 8;
>  
> -	opts.kprobe_multi.addrs = (const unsigned long *) &addrs;
> +	opts.kprobe_multi.addrs = (const __u64 *) &addrs;
>  	opts.kprobe_multi.cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(addrs);
>  	opts.kprobe_multi.cookies = (const __u64 *) &cookies;
>  	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_kprobe);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> index 586dc52..7646112 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static void test_link_api_addrs(void)
>  	GET_ADDR("bpf_fentry_test7", addrs[6]);
>  	GET_ADDR("bpf_fentry_test8", addrs[7]);
>  
> -	opts.kprobe_multi.addrs = (const unsigned long*) addrs;
> +	opts.kprobe_multi.addrs = (const __u64 *) addrs;
>  	opts.kprobe_multi.cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(addrs);
>  	test_link_api(&opts);
>  }
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void test_attach_api_addrs(void)
>  	GET_ADDR("bpf_fentry_test7", addrs[6]);
>  	GET_ADDR("bpf_fentry_test8", addrs[7]);
>  
> -	opts.addrs = (const unsigned long *) addrs;
> +	opts.addrs = (const __u64 *) addrs;
>  	opts.cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(addrs);
>  	test_attach_api(NULL, &opts);
>  }
> @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static void test_attach_api_fails(void)
>  		goto cleanup;
>  
>  	/* fail_2 - both addrs and syms set */
> -	opts.addrs = (const unsigned long *) addrs;
> +	opts.addrs = (const __u64 *) addrs;
>  	opts.syms = syms;
>  	opts.cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(syms);
>  	opts.cookies = NULL;
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static void test_attach_api_fails(void)
>  		goto cleanup;
>  
>  	/* fail_3 - pattern and addrs set */
> -	opts.addrs = (const unsigned long *) addrs;
> +	opts.addrs = (const __u64 *) addrs;
>  	opts.syms = NULL;
>  	opts.cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(syms);
>  	opts.cookies = NULL;
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ