linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] remoteproc: support self recovery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANLsYkx089h16omSwAuteQz4RX9BMgT4_gWg9OqggqXk6m2-rw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 10:41:56 +0100
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        peng.fan@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] remoteproc: support self recovery

On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 03:42, Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com> wrote:
>
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> V4:
>   Based on Bjorn's comments on V2-2
>   Move the rproc_has_feature/rproc_set_feature to remoteproc_internal.h and
>  Keep rproc_features still in remoteproc.h, because we use
>  RPROC_MAX_FEATURES to declare bitmap.
>   Update commit log for patch 2/2, and add comments

I have received your patches but there is a significant backlog to go
through before I can take a look at them.

Thanks,
Mathieu

>
> V3:
>  Resend the wrong labeled patchset
>  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=621311
>
>  Write a cover-letter
>  To i.MX8QM/QXP, they have a M4 core self-recovery capability without
>  Linux loading firmware. The self recovery is done by
>  SCU(System Control Unit). Current remoteproc framework only support Linux
>  help recovery remote processor(stop, loading firmware, start). This
>  patchset is support remote processor self recovery(attach recovery).
>
>  In order to avoid introducing a new variable(bool support_self_recovery),
>  patch 1 introduce a new function, rproc_has_feature to make code easy to
>  extend, cleaner, such as we could move "bool has_iommu" to
>  rproc_has_feature(rproc, RPROC_FEAT_IOMMU).
>
>  Patch 2 is introduce a new function rproc_attach_recovery for
>  self recovery, the original logic move to rproc_firmware_recovery meaning
>  needs linux to help recovery.
>
>  V2-version 2:
>  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=621311
>  Introduce rproc_has_feature
>
>  V2-version 1:
>  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20220126085120.3397450-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/
>  Nothing change in V2.
>  Only move this patch out from
>  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=604364
>
>
>
> Peng Fan (2):
>   remoteproc: introduce rproc features
>   remoteproc: support attach recovery after rproc crash
>
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 67 +++++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 10 ++++
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h               |  7 +++
>  3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>