linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YoN0cdUdYQotyod9@lahna>
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 13:09:53 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable

On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 09:56:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:
> 
>    "not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"
> 
> Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
> helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.
> 
> While at it, align IRQ chip callback names with member names for
> the sake of consistency.

Or for the sake of inconsistency? ;-)  All the other structs are not
using this kind of alignment and I would like to keep this one matching
the rest too. Also I prefer the format currently used in the driver.