[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53ceb2c7-f2d7-3b92-4efa-a063487585bc@igalia.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 10:03:13 -0300
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhe@...hat.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
kernel-dev@...lia.com, kernel@...ccoli.net, halves@...onical.com,
fabiomirmar@...il.com, alejandro.j.jimenez@...cle.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, arnd@...db.de, bp@...en8.de,
corbet@....net, d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, dyoung@...hat.com,
feng.tang@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mikelley@...rosoft.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com,
jgross@...e.com, john.ogness@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org,
luto@...nel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
tglx@...utronix.de, vgoyal@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
will@...nel.org,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@...cle.com>,
Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
zhenwei pi <pizhenwei@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/30] misc/pvpanic: Convert regular spinlock into trylock
on panic path
On 17/05/2022 07:58, Petr Mladek wrote:
> [...]
>> Thanks for the review Petr. Patch was already merged - my goal was to be
>> concise, i.e., a patch per driver / module, so the patch kinda fixes
>> whatever I think is wrong with the driver with regards panic handling.
>>
>> Do you think it worth to remove this patch from Greg's branch just to
>> split it in 2? Personally I think it's not worth, but opinions are welcome.
>
> No problem. It is not worth the effort.
>
OK, perfect!
Cheers,
Guilherme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists