linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 11/17] ARM: dts: imx6q-apalis: Add ov5640 mipi csi camera

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 16:54:24 +0200
From:   Max Krummenacher <max.oss.09@...il.com>
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc:     Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@...adex.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/17] ARM: dts: imx6q-apalis: Add ov5640 mipi csi camera

Hi Fabio

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 4:25 PM Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:21 AM Max Krummenacher <max.oss.09@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > In my (limited) testing I saw no issues that the camera would not come up.
> > It takes 2 to 3 seconds until the pipeline is running but I noted no hickups.
> > I did this with setting the resolution to 640x480 and 1920x1080 which
> > probably would not relate to the LP-11 issue you mention.
> >
> > I.e. I set up the v4l2 pipeline and start capture to the screen as follows:
>
> Just curious: which baseboard did you use to test the ov5640 camera?
>
> Most likely there was an issue with the customer's baseboard that
> prevented the camera capture to start.

I used an 'Apalis Evaluation Board' with an 'Apalis iMX6 Mezannine V2.0A'.
Now I did retry and it works equally well on an 'Ixora V1.1A'

Note that in the beginning the camera module required the SoM to provide
a 24MHz clock. The V1.1B HW version then got its local oscillator and the
clock input no longer requires a clock. That may or may not have been the
issue your customer saw.

Max