[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220518170254.3178923-2-heiko@sntech.de>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 19:02:51 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wefu@...hat.com, guoren@...nel.org, mick@....forth.gr,
samuel@...lland.org, cmuellner@...ux.com, philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu,
hch@....de, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] riscv: drop cpufeature_apply_feature tracking variable
The variable was tracking which feature patches got applied
but that information was never actually used - and thus resulted
in a warning as well.
Drop the variable.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
---
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index dea3ea19deee..b33564df81e1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -294,7 +294,6 @@ void __init_or_module riscv_cpufeature_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin,
unsigned int stage)
{
u32 cpu_req_feature = cpufeature_probe(stage);
- u32 cpu_apply_feature = 0;
struct alt_entry *alt;
u32 tmp;
@@ -308,10 +307,8 @@ void __init_or_module riscv_cpufeature_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin,
}
tmp = (1U << alt->errata_id);
- if (cpu_req_feature & tmp) {
+ if (cpu_req_feature & tmp)
patch_text_nosync(alt->old_ptr, alt->alt_ptr, alt->alt_len);
- cpu_apply_feature |= tmp;
- }
}
}
#endif
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists