[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220518185904.GA3685644-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 13:59:04 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <olekstysh@...il.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR QEMU'S CIRRUS DEVICE"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Julien Grall <julien@....org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/7] dt-bindings: Add xen,dev-domid property
description for xen-grant DMA ops
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 03:32:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 7:19 PM Oleksandr Tyshchenko <olekstysh@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/mmio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/mmio.yaml
> > index 10c22b5..29a0932 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/mmio.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/mmio.yaml
> > @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ description:
> > See https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=virtio for
> > more details.
> >
> > +allOf:
> > + - $ref: /schemas/arm/xen,dev-domid.yaml#
> > +
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > const: virtio,mmio
> > @@ -33,6 +36,10 @@ properties:
> > description: Required for devices making accesses thru an IOMMU.
> > maxItems: 1
> >
> > + xen,dev-domid:
> > + description: Required when Xen grant mappings need to be enabled for device.
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > +
> > required:
> > - compatible
> > - reg
>
> Sorry for joining the discussion late. Have you considered using the
> generic iommu
> binding here instead of a custom property? This would mean having a device
> node for the grant-table mechanism that can be referred to using the 'iommus'
> phandle property, with the domid as an additional argument.
>
> It does not quite fit the model that Linux currently uses for iommus,
> as that has an allocator for dma_addr_t space, but it would think it's
> conceptually close enough that it makes sense for the binding.
Something common is almost always better.
That may also have the issue that fw_devlink will make the 'iommu'
driver a dependency to probe.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists