lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n53CMwtCY6XqYRXBpY5g21cFKyr8BF34t79JfK3dKg8cEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 12:56:17 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Craig Hesling <hesling@...omium.org>,
        Tom Hughes <tomhughes@...omium.org>,
        Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
        Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] dt-bindings: cros-ec: Add ChromeOS fingerprint binding

Quoting Rob Herring (2022-05-18 09:13:48)
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 12:23:03PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Rob Herring (2022-05-16 08:20:03)
> > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 06:39:21PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
> > > > index 409ecef967ce..e5fe60beb9fe 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
> > > > +      - items:
> > > > +          - const: google,cros-ec-i2c
> > > > +      # For implementations of the FPMCU connected through SPI.
> > > > +      - items:
> > > > +          - const: google,cros-ec-fp
> > > > +          - const: google,cros-ec-spi
> > > > +      # For implementations of the EC is connected through SPI.
> > > > +      - items:
> > > > +          - const: google,cros-ec-spi
> > > > +      # For implementations of the EC is connected through RPMSG.
> > > > +      - items:
> > > > +          - const: google,cros-ec-rpmsg
> > > >
> > > >    controller-data:
> > > >      description:
> > > > @@ -176,6 +189,37 @@ allOf:
> > > >          - reg
> > > >          - interrupts
> > > >
> > > > +  - if:
> > > > +      properties:
> > > > +        compatible:
> > > > +          contains:
> > > > +            const: google,cros-ec-fp
> > > > +    then:
> > > > +      properties:
> > > > +        '#address-cells': false
> > > > +        '#size-cells': false
> > > > +        typec: false
> > > > +        ec-pwm: false
> > > > +        keyboard-controller: false
> > > > +        proximity: false
> > > > +        codecs: false
> > > > +        cbas: false
> > > > +
> > > > +      patternProperties:
> > > > +        "^i2c-tunnel[0-9]*$": false
> > > > +        "^regulator@[0-9]+$": false
> > > > +        "^extcon[0-9]*$": false
> > >
> > > Is the list of what's allowed shorter? If so, you could list those
> > > properties and use 'additionalProperties: false'.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > >
> > > Or maybe this is a sign that this should be a separate schema document.
> >
> > I couldn't figure that out. I tried to add new properties here but it
> > didn't work.
>
> Like this?:
>
> then:
>   properties:
>     allowed-prop-1: true
>     allowed-prop-2: true
>     allowed-prop-3: true
>   additionalProperties: false

It doesn't seem to combine constraints?

I get this error:

	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.example.dt.yaml:
	ec@0: Additional properties are not allowed ('$nodename' was unexpected)


with this interdiff. I added the spi properties to reduce the additional
properties that aren't allowed.

---8<----
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
index 04b847fd5070..d47c7a273026 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
@@ -18,24 +18,21 @@ description:

 properties:
   compatible:
-    anyOf:
+    oneOf:
       - description:
           For implementations of the EC connected through I2C.
-      - items:
-          - const: google,cros-ec-i2c
+        const: google,cros-ec-i2c
       - description:
           For implementations of the FPMCU connected through SPI.
-      - items:
+        items:
           - const: google,cros-ec-fp
           - const: google,cros-ec-spi
       - description:
           For implementations of the EC connected through SPI.
-      - items:
-          - const: google,cros-ec-spi
+        const: google,cros-ec-spi
       - description:
           For implementations of the EC connected through RPMSG.
-      - items:
-          - const: google,cros-ec-rpmsg
+        const: google,cros-ec-rpmsg

   controller-data:
     description:
@@ -200,19 +197,14 @@ allOf:
             const: google,cros-ec-fp
     then:
       properties:
-        '#address-cells': false
-        '#size-cells': false
-        typec: false
-        ec-pwm: false
-        keyboard-controller: false
-        proximity: false
-        codecs: false
-        cbas: false
-
-      patternProperties:
-        "^i2c-tunnel[0-9]*$": false
-        "^regulator@[0-9]+$": false
-        "^extcon[0-9]*$": false
+        reset-gpios: true
+        boot0-gpios: true
+        vdd-supply: true
+        interrupts: true
+        compatible: true
+        reg: true
+        spi-max-frequency: true
+      additionalProperties: false

       required:
         - reset-gpios

>
> > And then when I tried to make a different schema document
> > it complained that the example for google,cros-ec-spi in here had a
> > problem.
>
> You probably need a custom 'select' so that both schemas aren't
> matching. Otherwise a schema is applied if any of the compatible strings
> match.

I see. Maybe that's better vs. jamming it all into one file.

>
> > Can properties be defined in this section?
>
> Yes, but discouraged for vendor specific properties. The if/then should
> really be just additional constraints.

Ok.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ