[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220518224725.742882-2-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 15:47:20 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Blake Jones <blakejones@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] perf report: Do not extend sample type of bpf-output event
Currently evsel__new_idx() sets more sample_type bits when it finds a
BPF-output event. But it should honor what's recorded in the perf
data file rather than blindly sets the bits. Otherwise it could lead
to a parse error when it recorded with a modified sample_type.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index 1cf967d689aa..d3c8ebdc6d43 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -296,8 +296,8 @@ struct evsel *evsel__new_idx(struct perf_event_attr *attr, int idx)
return NULL;
evsel__init(evsel, attr, idx);
- if (evsel__is_bpf_output(evsel)) {
- evsel->core.attr.sample_type |= (PERF_SAMPLE_RAW | PERF_SAMPLE_TIME |
+ if (evsel__is_bpf_output(evsel) && !attr->sample_type) {
+ evsel->core.attr.sample_type = (PERF_SAMPLE_RAW | PERF_SAMPLE_TIME |
PERF_SAMPLE_CPU | PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD),
evsel->core.attr.sample_period = 1;
}
--
2.36.1.124.g0e6072fb45-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists