[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220518055729.1869566-1-leo.yan@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 13:57:18 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>, Alyssa Ross <hi@...ssa.is>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Adam Li <adamli@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>,
Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>, Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 00/11] perf c2c: Support display for Arm64
Arm64 Neoverse CPUs supports data source in Arm SPE trace, this allows
us to detect cache line contention and transfers.
Unlike x86 architecture, Arm SPE trace data cannot provide 'HITM'
snooping flag, Ali Said has a patch set v9 "perf: arm-spe: Decode SPE
source and use for perf c2c" [1] which introduces 'peer' flag and
synthesizes memory samples with this flag.
Based on patch set [1], this patch set is to finish the second half work
to consume the 'peer' flag in perf c2c tool, it adds an extra display
'peer' mode.
Patches 01, 02 and 03 are to support 'N/A' metrics for store operations.
Patches 04 and 05 adds statistics and dimensions for memory samples with
peer flag.
Patches 06, 07, 08 are for refactoring, it refines the code with more
general naming so this can allow us to easier to extend display modes
but not strictly bound to HITM tags.
Patches 09, 10 and 11 are to extend display 'peer' mode, it also updates
the document and also changes to use 'peer' mode as default mode on
Arm64 arches.
This patch set has been verified for both x86 and Arm64 memory samples.
The display result with x86 memory samples:
=================================================
Shared Data Cache Line Table
=================================================
#
# ----------- Cacheline ---------- Tot ------- Load Hitm ------- Snoop Total Total Total --------- Stores -------- ----- Core Load Hit ----- - LLC Load Hit -- - RMT Load Hit -- --- Load Dram ----
# Index Address Node PA cnt Hitm Total LclHitm RmtHitm Peer records Loads Stores L1Hit L1Miss N/A FB L1 L2 LclHit LclHitm RmtHit RmtHitm Lcl Rmt
# ..... .................. .... ...... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........ ....... ........ ....... ........ ........
#
0 0x55c8971f0080 0 1967 66.14% 252 252 0 0 6044 3550 2494 2024 470 0 528 2672 78 20 252 0 0 0 0
1 0x55c8971f00c0 0 1 33.86% 129 129 0 0 914 914 0 0 0 0 272 374 52 87 129 0 0 0 0
=================================================
Shared Cache Line Distribution Pareto
=================================================
#
# ----- HITM ----- Snoop ------- Store Refs ------ --------- Data address --------- --------------- cycles --------------- Total cpu Shared
# Num RmtHitm LclHitm Peer L1 Hit L1 Miss N/A Offset Node PA cnt Code address rmt hitm lcl hitm load peer records cnt Symbol Object Source:Line Node
# ..... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... .................. .... ...... .................. ........ ........ ........ ........ ....... ........ ...................... ................. ....................... ....
#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 252 0 2024 470 0 0x55c8971f0080
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.00% 12.30% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x0 0 1 0x55c8971ed3e9 0 1313 863 0 1222 3 [.] 0x00000000000013e9 false_sharing.exe false_sharing.exe[13e9] 0
0.00% 0.79% 0.00% 90.51% 0.00% 0.00% 0x0 0 1 0x55c8971ed3e2 0 1800 878 0 3029 3 [.] 0x00000000000013e2 false_sharing.exe false_sharing.exe[13e2] 0
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9.49% 100.00% 0.00% 0x0 0 1 0x55c8971ed3f4 0 0 0 0 662 3 [.] 0x00000000000013f4 false_sharing.exe false_sharing.exe[13f4] 0
0.00% 86.90% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x20 0 1 0x55c8971ed447 0 141 103 0 1131 2 [.] 0x0000000000001447 false_sharing.exe false_sharing.exe[1447] 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0 129 0 0 0 0 0x55c8971f00c0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x20 0 1 0x55c8971ed455 0 88 94 0 914 2 [.] 0x0000000000001455 false_sharing.exe false_sharing.exe[1455] 0
The display result with Arm SPE memory samples:
=================================================
Shared Data Cache Line Table
=================================================
#
# ----------- Cacheline ---------- Snoop ------- Load Hitm ------- Snoop Total Total Total --------- Stores -------- ----- Core Load Hit ----- - LLC Load Hit -- - RMT Load Hit -- --- Load Dram ----
# Index Address Node PA cnt Peer Total LclHitm RmtHitm Peer records Loads Stores L1Hit L1Miss N/A FB L1 L2 LclHit LclHitm RmtHit RmtHitm Lcl Rmt
# ..... .................. .... ...... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........ ....... ........ ....... ........ ........
#
0 0xaaaac17d6000 N/A 0 100.00% 0 0 0 99 18851 18851 0 0 0 0 0 18752 0 99 0 0 0 0 0
=================================================
Shared Cache Line Distribution Pareto
=================================================
#
# ----- HITM ----- Snoop ------- Store Refs ------ --------- Data address --------- --------------- cycles --------------- Total cpu Shared
# Num RmtHitm LclHitm Peer L1 Hit L1 Miss N/A Offset Node PA cnt Code address rmt hitm lcl hitm load peer records cnt Symbol Object Source:Line Node
# ..... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... .................. .... ...... .................. ........ ........ ........ ........ ....... ........ ...................... ................ ............... ....
#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 99 0 0 0 0xaaaac17d6000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.00% 0.00% 6.06% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x20 N/A 0 0xaaaac17c25ac 0 0 43 375 18469 2 [.] 0x00000000000025ac memstress memstress[25ac] 0
0.00% 0.00% 93.94% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0x29 N/A 0 0xaaaac17c3e88 0 0 173 180 135 2 [.] 0x0000000000003e88 memstress memstress[3e88] 0
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220517020326.18580-1-alisaidi@amazon.com/
Changes from v2:
* Updated patch 04 to account metrics for both cache level and ld_peer
for PEER flag;
* Updated document for metric 'rmt_hit' which is accounted for all
remote accesses (include remote DRAM and any upward caches).
Changes from v1:
* Updated patches 01, 02 and 03 to support 'N/A' metrics for store
operations, so can align with the patch set [1] for store samples.
Leo Yan (11):
perf mem: Add stats for store operation with no available memory level
perf c2c: Add dimensions for 'N/A' metrics of store operation
perf c2c: Update documentation for store metric 'N/A'
perf mem: Add statistics for peer snooping
perf c2c: Add dimensions for peer load operations
perf c2c: Use explicit names for display macros
perf c2c: Rename dimension from 'percent_hitm' to
'percent_costly_snoop'
perf c2c: Refactor node header
perf c2c: Sort on peer snooping for load operations
perf c2c: Update documentation for new display option 'peer'
perf c2c: Use 'peer' as default display for Arm64
tools/perf/Documentation/perf-c2c.txt | 34 ++-
tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c | 357 ++++++++++++++++++++------
tools/perf/util/mem-events.c | 25 +-
tools/perf/util/mem-events.h | 2 +
4 files changed, 331 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists