[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202205181534.wuyBFt9d-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 15:16:15 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@...dia.com>, robin.murphy@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@....com,
thanu.rangarajan@....com, Michael.Williams@....com,
suzuki.poulose@....com, treding@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
vsethi@...dia.com, Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf: coresight_pmu: Add support for ARM
CoreSight PMU driver
Hi Besar,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test WARNING on soc/for-next linus/master v5.18-rc7 next-20220517]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Besar-Wicaksono/perf-coresight_pmu-Add-support-for-ARM-CoreSight-PMU-driver/20220516-013131
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
config: arm64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220518/202205181534.wuyBFt9d-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 853fa8ee225edf2d0de94b0dcbd31bea916e825e)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install arm64 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/79f30980a7a91e6bbe7430206e4e46fa8134cfa9
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Besar-Wicaksono/perf-coresight_pmu-Add-support-for-ARM-CoreSight-PMU-driver/20220516-013131
git checkout 79f30980a7a91e6bbe7430206e4e46fa8134cfa9
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/ drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/ drivers/rtc/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:165:49: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
return CHECK_APMT_FLAG(coresight_pmu->apmt_node->flags, ATOMIC, SUPP);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:129:4: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_APMT_FLAG'
((flags & (ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ ## f)) == (ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ ## f ## _ ## v))
^~~~~
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.h:116:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node;
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:165:9: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ATOMIC'
return CHECK_APMT_FLAG(coresight_pmu->apmt_node->flags, ATOMIC, SUPP);
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:129:13: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_APMT_FLAG'
((flags & (ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ ## f)) == (ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ ## f ## _ ## v))
^
<scratch space>:61:1: note: expanded from here
ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ATOMIC
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:165:9: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ATOMIC_SUPP'
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:129:41: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_APMT_FLAG'
((flags & (ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ ## f)) == (ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ ## f ## _ ## v))
^
<scratch space>:64:1: note: expanded from here
ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ATOMIC_SUPP
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:369:13: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
(apmt_node->impl_id) ? apmt_node->impl_id :
~~~~~~~~~^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.h:116:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node;
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:369:35: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
(apmt_node->impl_id) ? apmt_node->impl_id :
~~~~~~~~~^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.h:116:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node;
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:894:58: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, PMUNAME "%u", apmt_node->id);
~~~~~~~~~^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.h:116:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node;
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:920:31: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
if (CHECK_APMT_FLAG(apmt_node->flags, DUAL_PAGE, SUPP)) {
~~~~~~~~~^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:129:4: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_APMT_FLAG'
((flags & (ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ ## f)) == (ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ ## f ## _ ## v))
^~~~~
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.h:116:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node;
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:920:6: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_DUAL_PAGE'
if (CHECK_APMT_FLAG(apmt_node->flags, DUAL_PAGE, SUPP)) {
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:129:13: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_APMT_FLAG'
((flags & (ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ ## f)) == (ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ ## f ## _ ## v))
^
<scratch space>:60:1: note: expanded from here
ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_DUAL_PAGE
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:920:6: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_DUAL_PAGE_SUPP'
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:129:41: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_APMT_FLAG'
((flags & (ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ ## f)) == (ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_ ## f ## _ ## v))
^
<scratch space>:63:1: note: expanded from here
ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_DUAL_PAGE_SUPP
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:1028:15: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
if (apmt_node->ovflw_irq == 0)
~~~~~~~~~^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.h:116:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node;
^
>> drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:1053:6: warning: variable 'level' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int level = 0;
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:1079:27: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
affinity_flag = apmt_node->flags & ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_AFFINITY;
~~~~~~~~~^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.h:116:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node;
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:1079:37: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_AFFINITY'
affinity_flag = apmt_node->flags & ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_AFFINITY;
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:1081:23: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_AFFINITY_PROC'
if (affinity_flag == ACPI_APMT_FLAGS_AFFINITY_PROC) {
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:1083:17: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
if (apmt_node->proc_affinity ==
~~~~~~~~~^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.h:116:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node;
^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c:1093:23: error: incomplete definition of type 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
cpu, apmt_node->proc_affinity))
~~~~~~~~~^
drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.h:116:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct acpi_apmt_node'
struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node;
^
1 warning and 15 errors generated.
vim +/level +1053 drivers/perf/coresight_pmu/arm_coresight_pmu.c
1047
1048 static inline int coresight_pmu_find_cpu_container(int cpu, u32 container_uid)
1049 {
1050 u32 acpi_uid;
1051 struct device *cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
1052 struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = ACPI_COMPANION(cpu_dev);
> 1053 int level = 0;
1054
1055 if (!cpu_dev)
1056 return -ENODEV;
1057
1058 while (acpi_dev) {
1059 if (!strcmp(acpi_device_hid(acpi_dev),
1060 ACPI_PROCESSOR_CONTAINER_HID) &&
1061 !kstrtouint(acpi_device_uid(acpi_dev), 0, &acpi_uid) &&
1062 acpi_uid == container_uid)
1063 return 0;
1064
1065 acpi_dev = acpi_dev->parent;
1066 level++;
1067 }
1068
1069 return -ENODEV;
1070 }
1071
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists