lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 00:39:41 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com,
        akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com, hch@...radead.org,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vfio: remove VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM

>  	if (device->ops->flags & VFIO_DEVICE_NEEDS_KVM)
>  	{

Nit: this is not the normal brace placement.

But what is you diff against anyway?  The one Matthew sent did away
with the VFIO_DEVICE_NEEDS_KVM flags, which does the wrong thing for
zpci, so it can't be that..

Also if we want to do major code movement, it really needs to go into
a separate patch or patches, as the combinations of all these moves
with actual code changes is almost unreadable.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ