[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YoS6EkfU1TdggKS/@lahna>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 12:19:14 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:46:06AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 08:08:17AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 07:38:19PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > +static const struct irq_chip intel_gpio_irq_chip = {
> > > + .name = "intel-gpio",
> > > + .irq_ack = intel_gpio_irq_ack,
> > > + .irq_mask = intel_gpio_irq_mask,
> > > + .irq_unmask = intel_gpio_irq_unmask,
> > > + .irq_set_type = intel_gpio_irq_type,
> > > + .irq_set_wake = intel_gpio_irq_wake,
> > > + .flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND | IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
> > > + GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
> > > +};
> >
> > You still have the inconsistent alignment here.
>
> I'm not sure what problem do you see.
I mean the tab alignment you use:
.name = "intel-gpio",
.irq_ack = intel_gpio_irq_ack,
.irq_mask = intel_gpio_irq_mask,
.irq_unmask = intel_gpio_irq_unmask,
.irq_set_type = intel_gpio_irq_type,
.irq_set_wake = intel_gpio_irq_wake,
All the other struct initializations in the driver use this style (and I
prefer it too):
.name = "intel-gpio",
.irq_ack = intel_gpio_irq_ack,
.irq_mask = intel_gpio_irq_mask,
.irq_unmask = intel_gpio_irq_unmask,
.irq_set_type = intel_gpio_irq_type,
.irq_set_wake = intel_gpio_irq_wake,
Hope this explains.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists