lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 14:59:24 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, robdclark@...il.com,
        sean@...rly.run, swboyd@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
        daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...ux.ie, agross@...nel.org,
        dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com, quic_aravindh@...cinc.com,
        quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] phy/qcom: add regulator_set_load to edp/dp phy

On 17-05-22, 10:25, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:

pls use the correct subsystem tag, "phy: xxx" in this case

> This patch add regulator_set_load() to both eDP and DP phy driver
> to have totally control regulators.

Can you explain what is meant by "totally control regulators"

> 
> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> index cacd32f..9b55095 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> @@ -87,17 +87,24 @@ struct qcom_edp {
>  
>  	struct clk_bulk_data clks[2];
>  	struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
> +	int enable_load[2];
> +	int disable_load[2];
>  };
>  
>  static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>  	int ret;
> +	int num_consumers = ARRAY_SIZE(edp->supplies);
> +	int i;
>  
> -	ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(edp->supplies), edp->supplies);
> +	ret = regulator_bulk_enable(num_consumers, edp->supplies);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	for (i = num_consumers - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> +		regulator_set_load(edp->supplies[i].consumer, edp->enable_load[i]);
> +
>  	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(edp->clks), edp->clks);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_disable_supplies;
> @@ -425,9 +432,15 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
>  static int qcom_edp_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> +	int num_consumers = ARRAY_SIZE(edp->supplies);
> +	int i;
>  
>  	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(edp->clks), edp->clks);
> -	regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(edp->supplies), edp->supplies);
> +
> +	for (i = num_consumers - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> +		regulator_set_load(edp->supplies[i].consumer, edp->disable_load[i]);
> +
> +	regulator_bulk_disable(num_consumers, edp->supplies);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -633,8 +646,12 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	edp->supplies[0].supply = "vdda-phy";
> -	edp->supplies[1].supply = "vdda-pll";
> +	edp->supplies[0].supply = "vdda-1p2";
> +	edp->supplies[1].supply = "vdda-0p9";

These are documented in bindings, so cannot be removed, Reminder binding
is an ABI
 
You have not documented the new names either...

> +	edp->enable_load[0] = 21800;	/* 1.2 V */
> +	edp->enable_load[1] = 36000;	/* 1.2 V */
> +	edp->disable_load[0] = 4;	/* 0.9 V */
> +	edp->disable_load[1] = 4;	/* 10.9V */

is that correct, 10.9V?

>  	ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(edp->supplies), edp->supplies);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> index b144ae1..c589231 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c

This is a different driver, so should be a different patch!

> @@ -3130,6 +3130,8 @@ struct qmp_phy_cfg {
>  	int num_resets;
>  	/* regulators to be requested */
>  	const char * const *vreg_list;
> +	const unsigned int *vreg_enable_load;
> +	const unsigned int *vreg_disable_load;
>  	int num_vregs;
>  
>  	/* array of registers with different offsets */
> @@ -3346,6 +3348,14 @@ static const char * const qmp_phy_vreg_l[] = {
>  	"vdda-phy", "vdda-pll",
>  };
>  
> +static const unsigned int qmp_phy_vreg_enable_load[] = {
> +	21800, 36000
> +};
> +
> +static const unsigned int qmp_phy_vreg_disable_load[] = {
> +	4, 32
> +};
> +
>  static const struct qmp_phy_cfg ipq8074_usb3phy_cfg = {
>  	.type			= PHY_TYPE_USB3,
>  	.nlanes			= 1,
> @@ -4072,6 +4082,8 @@ static const struct qmp_phy_cfg sm8250_usb3phy_cfg = {
>  	.reset_list		= msm8996_usb3phy_reset_l,
>  	.num_resets		= ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_usb3phy_reset_l),
>  	.vreg_list		= qmp_phy_vreg_l,
> +	.vreg_enable_load	= qmp_phy_vreg_enable_load,
> +	.vreg_disable_load	= qmp_phy_vreg_disable_load,
>  	.num_vregs		= ARRAY_SIZE(qmp_phy_vreg_l),
>  	.regs			= qmp_v4_usb3phy_regs_layout,
>  
> @@ -4139,6 +4151,8 @@ static const struct qmp_phy_cfg sm8250_dpphy_cfg = {
>  	.reset_list		= msm8996_usb3phy_reset_l,
>  	.num_resets		= ARRAY_SIZE(msm8996_usb3phy_reset_l),
>  	.vreg_list		= qmp_phy_vreg_l,
> +	.vreg_enable_load	= qmp_phy_vreg_enable_load,
> +	.vreg_disable_load	= qmp_phy_vreg_disable_load,
>  	.num_vregs		= ARRAY_SIZE(qmp_phy_vreg_l),
>  	.regs			= qmp_v4_usb3phy_regs_layout,
>  
> @@ -5015,6 +5029,11 @@ static int qcom_qmp_phy_com_init(struct qmp_phy *qphy)
>  		goto err_reg_enable;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (cfg->vreg_enable_load) {
> +		for (i = cfg->num_vregs - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> +			regulator_set_load(qmp->vregs[i].consumer, cfg->vreg_enable_load[i]);
> +	}
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_resets; i++) {
>  		ret = reset_control_assert(qmp->resets[i]);
>  		if (ret) {
> @@ -5116,6 +5135,11 @@ static int qcom_qmp_phy_com_exit(struct qmp_phy *qphy)
>  
>  	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(cfg->num_clks, qmp->clks);
>  
> +	if (cfg->vreg_disable_load[i]) {
> +		for (i = cfg->num_vregs - 1; i >= 0; --i)
> +			regulator_set_load(qmp->vregs[i].consumer, cfg->vreg_disable_load[i]);
> +	}
> +
>  	regulator_bulk_disable(cfg->num_vregs, qmp->vregs);
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&qmp->phy_mutex);
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

-- 
~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ