lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YoTcmqygoMm/gmsZ@matsya>
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 17:16:34 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dmaengine tree with Linus' tree

On 17-05-22, 15:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the dmaengine tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/dma/idxd/device.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   1cd8e751d96c ("dmaengine: idxd: skip clearing device context when device is read-only")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   cf4ac3fef338 ("dmaengine: idxd: fix lockdep warning on device driver removal")

Thank you Stephen, the merge looks right to me. Dave pls verify and test
-next

> 
> from the dmaengine tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/dma/idxd/device.c
> index f652da6ab47d,1143886f4a80..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/dma/idxd/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/idxd/device.c
> @@@ -699,21 -716,23 +716,26 @@@ static void idxd_device_wqs_clear_state
>   		struct idxd_wq *wq = idxd->wqs[i];
>   
>   		if (wq->state == IDXD_WQ_ENABLED) {
> + 			mutex_lock(&wq->wq_lock);
>   			idxd_wq_disable_cleanup(wq);
>  -			idxd_wq_device_reset_cleanup(wq);
>   			wq->state = IDXD_WQ_DISABLED;
> + 			mutex_unlock(&wq->wq_lock);
>   		}
>  +		idxd_wq_device_reset_cleanup(wq);
>   	}
>   }
>   
>   void idxd_device_clear_state(struct idxd_device *idxd)
>   {
>  +	if (!test_bit(IDXD_FLAG_CONFIGURABLE, &idxd->flags))
>  +		return;
>  +
> + 	idxd_device_wqs_clear_state(idxd);
> + 	spin_lock(&idxd->dev_lock);
>   	idxd_groups_clear_state(idxd);
>   	idxd_engines_clear_state(idxd);
> - 	idxd_device_wqs_clear_state(idxd);
> + 	idxd->state = IDXD_DEV_DISABLED;
> + 	spin_unlock(&idxd->dev_lock);
>   }
>   
>   static void idxd_group_config_write(struct idxd_group *group)



-- 
~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ