linux-kernel - Re: [patch 8/9] scripts/spdxcheck: Exclude dot files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YoT2QwOuaQXs17Bk@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 15:36:03 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [patch 8/9] scripts/spdxcheck: Exclude dot files

On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 08:43:52PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, May 16 2022 at 16:22, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:55 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> None of these files
> >>
> >>      .clang-format, .cocciconfig, .get_maintainer.ignore, .gitattributes,
> >>      .gitignore, .mailmap
> >>
> >> have copyrightable content. They are configuration files which use a
> >> publicly documented format.
> >
> > Should this files remove their SPDX-License-Identifier? If yes, we
> > should do that for `.clang-format`.
> >
> > As another suggestion, we should check that the ignored files actually
> > do _not_ have the `SPDX-License-Identifier` (i.e. so the above case
> > would trigger a diagnostic).
> 
> Good questions. I'm happy to drop this patch for now until this
> discussion has been settled.

I've now taken all patches in this series except for this one.

thanks for doing this work,

greg k-h