linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] amba: Drop builtin_amba

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f8b83f8e-eb99-16e4-4e9a-dca58971b437@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 May 2022 08:38:43 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Wang Kefeng <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amba: Drop builtin_amba_driver()



On 5/18/22 17:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 7:29 AM Anshuman Khandual
> <anshuman.khandual@....com> wrote:
>>
>> Drop builtin_amba_driver() which is not used anymore.
> 
> The patch looks correct, but I don't see the purpose. Are you trying
> to discourage
> having amba drivers as built-in? Otherwise the next time we get an amba
> driver that cannot be a loadable module, someone might want to add back the
> same macro.

Right, then it should be added back. But for now this is just dead code
and not being used, hence why keep it ?