[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ab6bb11-4510-0efc-0ad6-507d749022f2@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 12:23:49 -0400
From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, jgg@...dia.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc: cohuck@...hat.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com, hch@...radead.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] vfio: remove VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM
I made a few comments, but other than that this looks good to
me:
Reviewed-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
On 5/18/22 5:26 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> Rather than relying on a notifier for associating the KVM with
> the group, let's assume that the association has already been
> made prior to device_open. The first time a device is opened
> associate the group KVM with the device.
>
> This fixes a user-triggerable oops in GVT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h | 3 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 82 ++++++---------------------
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 38 ++++---------
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 3 -
> drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 75 ++++++++----------------
> include/linux/vfio.h | 5 +-
> 7 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
> index 9c5cc2800975..b4f69364f9a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int preallocated_oos_pages = 8192;
>
> static bool intel_gvt_is_valid_gfn(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, unsigned long gfn)
> {
> - struct kvm *kvm = vgpu->kvm;
> + struct kvm *kvm = vgpu->vfio_device.kvm;
> int idx;
> bool ret;
>
> @@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@ static int is_2MB_gtt_possible(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
>
> if (!vgpu->attached)
> return -EINVAL;
> - pfn = gfn_to_pfn(vgpu->kvm, ops->get_pfn(entry));
> + pfn = gfn_to_pfn(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm, ops->get_pfn(entry));
> if (is_error_noslot_pfn(pfn))
> return -EINVAL;
> return PageTransHuge(pfn_to_page(pfn));
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h
> index 2af4c83e733c..aee1a45da74b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h
> @@ -227,9 +227,6 @@ struct intel_vgpu {
> struct mutex cache_lock;
>
> struct notifier_block iommu_notifier;
> - struct notifier_block group_notifier;
> - struct kvm *kvm;
> - struct work_struct release_work;
> atomic_t released;
>
> struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node track_node;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> index 7655ffa97d51..e2f6c56ab342 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> @@ -228,8 +228,6 @@ static void intel_gvt_cleanup_vgpu_type_groups(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
> }
> }
>
> -static void intel_vgpu_release_work(struct work_struct *work);
> -
> static void gvt_unpin_guest_page(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, unsigned long gfn,
> unsigned long size)
> {
> @@ -761,23 +759,6 @@ static int intel_vgpu_iommu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> }
>
> -static int intel_vgpu_group_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> - unsigned long action, void *data)
> -{
> - struct intel_vgpu *vgpu =
> - container_of(nb, struct intel_vgpu, group_notifier);
> -
> - /* the only action we care about */
> - if (action == VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM) {
> - vgpu->kvm = data;
> -
> - if (!data)
> - schedule_work(&vgpu->release_work);
> - }
> -
> - return NOTIFY_OK;
> -}
> -
> static bool __kvmgt_vgpu_exist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> {
> struct intel_vgpu *itr;
> @@ -789,7 +770,7 @@ static bool __kvmgt_vgpu_exist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> if (!itr->attached)
> continue;
>
> - if (vgpu->kvm == itr->kvm) {
> + if (vgpu->vfio_device.kvm == itr->vfio_device.kvm) {
> ret = true;
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -806,7 +787,6 @@ static int intel_vgpu_open_device(struct vfio_device *vfio_dev)
> int ret;
>
> vgpu->iommu_notifier.notifier_call = intel_vgpu_iommu_notifier;
> - vgpu->group_notifier.notifier_call = intel_vgpu_group_notifier;
>
> events = VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY_DMA_UNMAP;
> ret = vfio_register_notifier(vfio_dev, VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY, &events,
> @@ -817,38 +797,32 @@ static int intel_vgpu_open_device(struct vfio_device *vfio_dev)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - events = VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM;
> - ret = vfio_register_notifier(vfio_dev, VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY, &events,
> - &vgpu->group_notifier);
> - if (ret != 0) {
> - gvt_vgpu_err("vfio_register_notifier for group failed: %d\n",
> - ret);
> - goto undo_iommu;
> - }
> -
> ret = -EEXIST;
> if (vgpu->attached)
> - goto undo_register;
> + goto undo_iommu;
>
> ret = -ESRCH;
> - if (!vgpu->kvm || vgpu->kvm->mm != current->mm) {
> + if (!vgpu->vfio_device.kvm ||
> + vgpu->vfio_device.kvm->mm != current->mm) {
> gvt_vgpu_err("KVM is required to use Intel vGPU\n");
> - goto undo_register;
> + goto undo_iommu;
> }
>
> + kvm_get_kvm(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm);
> +
> ret = -EEXIST;
> if (__kvmgt_vgpu_exist(vgpu))
> - goto undo_register;
> + goto undo_iommu;
>
> vgpu->attached = true;
> - kvm_get_kvm(vgpu->kvm);
>
> kvmgt_protect_table_init(vgpu);
> gvt_cache_init(vgpu);
>
> vgpu->track_node.track_write = kvmgt_page_track_write;
> vgpu->track_node.track_flush_slot = kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot;
> - kvm_page_track_register_notifier(vgpu->kvm, &vgpu->track_node);
> + kvm_page_track_register_notifier(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm,
> + &vgpu->track_node);
>
> debugfs_create_ulong(KVMGT_DEBUGFS_FILENAME, 0444, vgpu->debugfs,
> &vgpu->nr_cache_entries);
> @@ -858,10 +832,6 @@ static int intel_vgpu_open_device(struct vfio_device *vfio_dev)
> atomic_set(&vgpu->released, 0);
> return 0;
>
> -undo_register:
> - vfio_unregister_notifier(vfio_dev, VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY,
> - &vgpu->group_notifier);
> -
> undo_iommu:
> vfio_unregister_notifier(vfio_dev, VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY,
> &vgpu->iommu_notifier);
> @@ -880,8 +850,9 @@ static void intel_vgpu_release_msi_eventfd_ctx(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> }
> }
>
> -static void __intel_vgpu_release(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> +static void intel_vgpu_close_device(struct vfio_device *vfio_dev)
> {
> + struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = vfio_dev_to_vgpu(vfio_dev);
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = vgpu->gvt->gt->i915;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -898,35 +869,19 @@ static void __intel_vgpu_release(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
> drm_WARN(&i915->drm, ret,
> "vfio_unregister_notifier for iommu failed: %d\n", ret);
>
> - ret = vfio_unregister_notifier(&vgpu->vfio_device, VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY,
> - &vgpu->group_notifier);
> - drm_WARN(&i915->drm, ret,
> - "vfio_unregister_notifier for group failed: %d\n", ret);
> -
> debugfs_remove(debugfs_lookup(KVMGT_DEBUGFS_FILENAME, vgpu->debugfs));
>
> - kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(vgpu->kvm, &vgpu->track_node);
> - kvm_put_kvm(vgpu->kvm);
> + kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm,
> + &vgpu->track_node);
> kvmgt_protect_table_destroy(vgpu);
> gvt_cache_destroy(vgpu);
>
> intel_vgpu_release_msi_eventfd_ctx(vgpu);
>
> - vgpu->kvm = NULL;
> vgpu->attached = false;
> -}
> -
> -static void intel_vgpu_close_device(struct vfio_device *vfio_dev)
> -{
> - __intel_vgpu_release(vfio_dev_to_vgpu(vfio_dev));
> -}
> -
> -static void intel_vgpu_release_work(struct work_struct *work)
> -{
> - struct intel_vgpu *vgpu =
> - container_of(work, struct intel_vgpu, release_work);
>
> - __intel_vgpu_release(vgpu);
> + if (vgpu->vfio_device.kvm)
> + kvm_put_kvm(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm);
> }
>
> static u64 intel_vgpu_get_bar_addr(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, int bar)
> @@ -1675,7 +1630,6 @@ static int intel_vgpu_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> return PTR_ERR(vgpu);
> }
>
> - INIT_WORK(&vgpu->release_work, intel_vgpu_release_work);
> vfio_init_group_dev(&vgpu->vfio_device, &mdev->dev,
> &intel_vgpu_dev_ops);
>
> @@ -1713,7 +1667,7 @@ static struct mdev_driver intel_vgpu_mdev_driver = {
>
> int intel_gvt_page_track_add(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
> {
> - struct kvm *kvm = info->kvm;
> + struct kvm *kvm = info->vfio_device.kvm;
> struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> int idx;
>
> @@ -1743,7 +1697,7 @@ int intel_gvt_page_track_add(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
>
> int intel_gvt_page_track_remove(struct intel_vgpu *info, u64 gfn)
> {
> - struct kvm *kvm = info->kvm;
> + struct kvm *kvm = info->vfio_device.kvm;
> struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> int idx;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index e8914024f5b1..17a56bb4cf25 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -1196,6 +1196,8 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
> {
> struct ap_matrix_mdev *m;
>
> + kvm_get_kvm(kvm);
> +
I'm not sure what version of the code on which the patch was rebased,
but in the
latest master branch from our repository the kvm_get_kvm(kvm) function is
called inside of the if block below. I'm fine with moving outside of the
block, but
I don't see a corresponding removal of it from inside the block.
> if (kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd) {
> down_write(&kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook_rwsem);
> kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = &matrix_mdev->pqap_hook;
> @@ -1282,25 +1284,9 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> }
> -}
>
> -static int vfio_ap_mdev_group_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> - unsigned long action, void *data)
> -{
> - int notify_rc = NOTIFY_OK;
> - struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
> -
> - if (action != VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM)
> - return NOTIFY_OK;
> -
> - matrix_mdev = container_of(nb, struct ap_matrix_mdev, group_notifier);
> -
> - if (!data)
> - vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(matrix_mdev);
> - else if (vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(matrix_mdev, data))
> - notify_rc = NOTIFY_DONE;
> -
> - return notify_rc;
Similarly, there is a call to kvm_put_kvm(kvm) inside the if block.
Again, I'm okay with moving this outside of the if block, but I would
think the call inside the if block ought to be removed.
> + if (kvm)
> + kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
> }
>
> static struct vfio_ap_queue *vfio_ap_find_queue(int apqn)
> @@ -1402,11 +1388,10 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_open_device(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> unsigned long events;
> int ret;
>
> - matrix_mdev->group_notifier.notifier_call = vfio_ap_mdev_group_notifier;
> - events = VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM;
> + if (!vdev->kvm)
> + return -EPERM;
Perhaps -EINVAL or -EFAULT?
>
> - ret = vfio_register_notifier(vdev, VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY, &events,
> - &matrix_mdev->group_notifier);
> + ret = vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm(matrix_mdev, vdev->kvm);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1415,12 +1400,11 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_open_device(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> ret = vfio_register_notifier(vdev, VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY, &events,
> &matrix_mdev->iommu_notifier);
> if (ret)
> - goto out_unregister_group;
> + goto err_kvm;
> return 0;
>
> -out_unregister_group:
> - vfio_unregister_notifier(vdev, VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY,
> - &matrix_mdev->group_notifier);
> +err_kvm:
> + vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(matrix_mdev);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1431,8 +1415,6 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_close_device(struct vfio_device *vdev)
>
> vfio_unregister_notifier(vdev, VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY,
> &matrix_mdev->iommu_notifier);
> - vfio_unregister_notifier(vdev, VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY,
> - &matrix_mdev->group_notifier);
> vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(matrix_mdev);
I'm not sure if this matters, but the vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(matrix_mdev)
function uses the KVM pointer stored in matrix_mdev->kvm. I can't imagine
the KVM pointer stored in vdev->kvm being different than matrix_mdev->kvm,
but thought I should point it out. Previously, this function was called
by the
notifier handler which did not have access to the KVM pointer which is
why it
was retrieved from matrix_mdev->kvm. Even if the vdev->kvm and
matrix_mdev->kvm did not match, we should probably go ahead and call
the unset function anyway to remove access to AP resources for the guest and
reset the queues.
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> index 648fcaf8104a..a26efd804d0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> @@ -81,8 +81,6 @@ struct ap_matrix {
> * @node: allows the ap_matrix_mdev struct to be added to a list
> * @matrix: the adapters, usage domains and control domains assigned to the
> * mediated matrix device.
> - * @group_notifier: notifier block used for specifying callback function for
> - * handling the VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM event
> * @iommu_notifier: notifier block used for specifying callback function for
> * handling the VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY_DMA_UNMAP even
> * @kvm: the struct holding guest's state
> @@ -94,7 +92,6 @@ struct ap_matrix_mdev {
> struct vfio_device vdev;
> struct list_head node;
> struct ap_matrix matrix;
> - struct notifier_block group_notifier;
> struct notifier_block iommu_notifier;
> struct kvm *kvm;
> crypto_hook pqap_hook;
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> index cfcff7764403..272acb62facd 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> @@ -1083,11 +1083,22 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
>
> mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> device->open_count++;
> + down_read(&device->group->group_rwsem);
> + if (device->open_count == 1 && device->group->kvm) {
> + /*
> + * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the read
> + * lock. If the device driver will use it, it must obtain a
> + * reference and release it during close_device.
> + */
> + device->kvm = device->group->kvm;
> + }
> +
> if (device->open_count == 1 && device->ops->open_device) {
> ret = device->ops->open_device(device);
> if (ret)
> goto err_undo_count;
> }
> + up_read(&device->group->group_rwsem);
> mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
>
> /*
> @@ -1119,10 +1130,14 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
>
> err_close_device:
> mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> + down_read(&device->group->group_rwsem);
> if (device->open_count == 1 && device->ops->close_device)
> device->ops->close_device(device);
> err_undo_count:
> device->open_count--;
> + if (device->open_count == 0 && device->kvm)
> + device->kvm = NULL;
> + up_read(&device->group->group_rwsem);
> mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
> err_unassign_container:
> @@ -1315,9 +1330,13 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>
> mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> vfio_assert_device_open(device);
> + down_read(&device->group->group_rwsem);
> if (device->open_count == 1 && device->ops->close_device)
> device->ops->close_device(device);
> device->open_count--;
> + if (device->open_count == 0 && device->kvm)
> + device->kvm = NULL;
> + up_read(&device->group->group_rwsem);
> mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
>
> module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
> @@ -1726,8 +1745,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_enforced_coherent);
> * @file: VFIO group file
> * @kvm: KVM to link
> *
> - * The kvm pointer will be forwarded to all the vfio_device's attached to the
> - * VFIO file via the VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM notifier.
> + * When a VFIO device is first opened the KVM will be available in
> + * device->kvm if one was associated with the group.
> */
> void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> @@ -1738,8 +1757,6 @@ void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)
>
> down_write(&group->group_rwsem);
> group->kvm = kvm;
> - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&group->notifier,
> - VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM, kvm);
> up_write(&group->group_rwsem);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_set_kvm);
> @@ -2006,7 +2023,8 @@ static int vfio_register_iommu_notifier(struct vfio_group *group,
> struct vfio_iommu_driver *driver;
> int ret;
>
> - down_read(&group->group_rwsem);
> + lockdep_assert_held_read(&group->group_rwsem);
> +
> container = group->container;
> driver = container->iommu_driver;
> if (likely(driver && driver->ops->register_notifier))
> @@ -2014,7 +2032,6 @@ static int vfio_register_iommu_notifier(struct vfio_group *group,
> events, nb);
> else
> ret = -ENOTTY;
> - up_read(&group->group_rwsem);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -2026,7 +2043,8 @@ static int vfio_unregister_iommu_notifier(struct vfio_group *group,
> struct vfio_iommu_driver *driver;
> int ret;
>
> - down_read(&group->group_rwsem);
> + lockdep_assert_held_read(&group->group_rwsem);
> +
> container = group->container;
> driver = container->iommu_driver;
> if (likely(driver && driver->ops->unregister_notifier))
> @@ -2034,47 +2052,10 @@ static int vfio_unregister_iommu_notifier(struct vfio_group *group,
> nb);
> else
> ret = -ENOTTY;
> - up_read(&group->group_rwsem);
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int vfio_register_group_notifier(struct vfio_group *group,
> - unsigned long *events,
> - struct notifier_block *nb)
> -{
> - int ret;
> - bool set_kvm = false;
> -
> - if (*events & VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM)
> - set_kvm = true;
> -
> - /* clear known events */
> - *events &= ~VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM;
> -
> - /* refuse to continue if still events remaining */
> - if (*events)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&group->notifier, nb);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - /*
> - * The attaching of kvm and vfio_group might already happen, so
> - * here we replay once upon registration.
> - */
> - if (set_kvm) {
> - down_read(&group->group_rwsem);
> - if (group->kvm)
> - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&group->notifier,
> - VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM,
> - group->kvm);
> - up_read(&group->group_rwsem);
> - }
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> int vfio_register_notifier(struct vfio_device *device,
> enum vfio_notify_type type, unsigned long *events,
> struct notifier_block *nb)
> @@ -2090,9 +2071,6 @@ int vfio_register_notifier(struct vfio_device *device,
> case VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY:
> ret = vfio_register_iommu_notifier(group, events, nb);
> break;
> - case VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY:
> - ret = vfio_register_group_notifier(group, events, nb);
> - break;
> default:
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -2114,9 +2092,6 @@ int vfio_unregister_notifier(struct vfio_device *device,
> case VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY:
> ret = vfio_unregister_iommu_notifier(group, nb);
> break;
> - case VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY:
> - ret = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&group->notifier, nb);
> - break;
> default:
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> index 45b287826ce6..5f691453e3fb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
> struct vfio_device_set *dev_set;
> struct list_head dev_set_list;
> unsigned int migration_flags;
> + struct kvm *kvm;
>
> /* Members below here are private, not for driver use */
> refcount_t refcount;
> @@ -155,15 +156,11 @@ extern int vfio_dma_rw(struct vfio_device *device, dma_addr_t user_iova,
> /* each type has independent events */
> enum vfio_notify_type {
> VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY = 0,
> - VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY = 1,
> };
>
> /* events for VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY */
> #define VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY_DMA_UNMAP BIT(0)
>
> -/* events for VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY */
> -#define VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM BIT(0)
> -
> extern int vfio_register_notifier(struct vfio_device *device,
> enum vfio_notify_type type,
> unsigned long *required_events,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists