[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ip7-6CUys88y8ydABJQsUUONAzyCa91qOiRsj2FCwMEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:09:55 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: utils: include UUID in _DSM evaluation warning
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 8:40 PM Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de> wrote:
>
> The _DSM evaluation warning in its current form is not very helpful, as
> it lacks any specific information:
> ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM (0x1001)
>
> Thus, include the UUID of the missing _DSM:
> ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM bf0212f2-... (0x1001)
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - fix arguments order
> - fix indentation
> - drop line break
>
> drivers/acpi/utils.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> index d5cedffeeff9..3a9773a09e19 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, u64 func,
>
> if (ret != AE_NOT_FOUND)
> acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> - "failed to evaluate _DSM (0x%x)\n", ret);
> + "failed to evaluate _DSM %pUb (0x%x)\n", guid, ret);
>
> return NULL;
> }
> --
Applied as 5.19 material, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists