linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98090: Remove unneeded check in max98090_put_enab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 May 2022 21:27:25 +0300
From:   Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98090: Remove unneeded check in
 max98090_put_enab_tlv()

On 19.05.2022 20:54, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 08:49:48PM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
>> On 19.05.2022 20:29, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 08:10:12PM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> 
>>>> -	if (sel < 0 || sel > mc->max)
>>>> +	if (sel > mc->max)
> 
>>> The check needs to be moved, not removed.  The userspace ABI allows
>>> passing in of negative values.
> 
>> Would (sel > mc->max) be enough in this case anyway?
> 
> Oh, the check won't be working properly - it's just that like I say the
> fix is to move rather than remove it so it's operating on the signed
> value.
> 

Do you mean something like this?

static int max98090_put_enab_tlv(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
				struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
	struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
	struct max98090_priv *max98090 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
	struct soc_mixer_control *mc =
		(struct soc_mixer_control *)kcontrol->private_value;
	unsigned int mask = (1 << fls(mc->max)) - 1;
-       unsigned int sel = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
+       int sel_unchecked = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
+       unsigned int sel;
	unsigned int val = snd_soc_component_read(component, mc->reg);
	unsigned int *select;

	switch (mc->reg) {
	case M98090_REG_MIC1_INPUT_LEVEL:
		select = &(max98090->pa1en);
		break;
	case M98090_REG_MIC2_INPUT_LEVEL:
		select = &(max98090->pa2en);
		break;
	case M98090_REG_ADC_SIDETONE:
		select = &(max98090->sidetone);
		break;
	default:
		return -EINVAL;
	}

	val = (val >> mc->shift) & mask;

-       if (sel < 0 || sel > mc->max)
+       if (sel_unchecked < 0 || sel_unchecked > mc->max)
                return -EINVAL;
+       sel = sel_unchecked;

	*select = sel;