[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220519204017.15586-1-paskripkin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 23:40:17 +0300
From: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To: vladimir.oltean@....com, claudiu.manoil@....com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: ocelot: fix wront time_after usage
Accidentally noticed, that this driver is the only user of
while (timer_after(jiffies...)).
It looks like typo, because likely this while loop will finish after 1st
iteration, because time_after() returns true when 1st argument _is after_
2nd one.
Fix it by negating time_after return value inside while loops statement
Fixes: 753a026cfec1 ("net: ocelot: add FDMA support")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_fdma.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_fdma.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_fdma.c
index dffa597bffe6..4500fed3ce5c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_fdma.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_fdma.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int ocelot_fdma_wait_chan_safe(struct ocelot *ocelot, int chan)
safe = ocelot_fdma_readl(ocelot, MSCC_FDMA_CH_SAFE);
if (safe & BIT(chan))
return 0;
- } while (time_after(jiffies, timeout));
+ } while (!time_after(jiffies, timeout));
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists