[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220519001438.E534DC385A9@smtp.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 17:14:37 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] clk: qcom: alpha-pll: correct kerneldoc
Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2022-05-17 09:46:49)
> On 01/05/2022 12:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Correct kerneldoc warning:
> >
> > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c:1450:
> > warning: expecting prototype for clk_lucid_pll_configure(). Prototype was for clk_trion_pll_configure() instead
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> Any comments on entire set?
Please send a cover letter next time. Also they're simply "qcom" related
but otherwise I'm not sure why they aren't sent to individual subsystem
lists. They don't depend on each other to build, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists