linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Fix referencing invalid rsp field

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <000001d86b4c$2d460640$87d212c0$@samsung.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 May 2022 15:46:32 +0900
From:   "Chanho Park" <chanho61.park@...sung.com>
To:     <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
        "'ALIM AKHTAR'" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
        <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <beanhuo@...ron.com>, <bvanassche@....org>
Cc:     <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Fix referencing invalid rsp field

> This is a patch for fixing referencing sense data when it is invalid.
> When the length of the data segment is 0, there is no valid information in
> the rsp field, so ufshpb_rsp_upiu() is returned without additional
> operation.
> 

You should put a proper fix tag to be applied the corresponding stable tree.
See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

Fixes: 4b5f49079c52 ("scsi: ufs: ufshpb: L2P map management for HPB read")

Best Regards,
Chanho Park

> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 19 +++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c index
> f1f65383e97d..8882b47f76d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
> @@ -1304,6 +1304,13 @@ void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct
> ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
>  	struct utp_hpb_rsp *rsp_field = &lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->hr;
>  	int data_seg_len;
> 
> +	data_seg_len = be32_to_cpu(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->header.dword_2)
> +		& MASK_RSP_UPIU_DATA_SEG_LEN;
> +
> +	/* If data segment length is zero, rsp_field is not valid */
> +	if (!data_seg_len)
> +		return;
> +
>  	if (unlikely(lrbp->lun != rsp_field->lun)) {
>  		struct scsi_device *sdev;
>  		bool found = false;
> @@ -1338,18 +1345,6 @@ void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct
> ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
>  		return;
>  	}
> 
> -	data_seg_len = be32_to_cpu(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->header.dword_2)
> -		& MASK_RSP_UPIU_DATA_SEG_LEN;
> -
> -	/* To flush remained rsp_list, we queue the map_work task */
> -	if (!data_seg_len) {
> -		if (!ufshpb_is_general_lun(hpb->lun))
> -			return;
> -
> -		ufshpb_kick_map_work(hpb);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct utp_hpb_rsp) != UTP_HPB_RSP_SIZE);
> 
>  	if (!ufshpb_is_hpb_rsp_valid(hba, lrbp, rsp_field))
> --
> 2.25.1
>