linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] clk: qcom: alpha-pll: correct kerneldoc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 May 2022 09:23:06 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] clk: qcom: alpha-pll: correct kerneldoc

On 19/05/2022 02:14, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2022-05-17 09:46:49)
>> On 01/05/2022 12:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Correct kerneldoc warning:
>>>
>>>   drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c:1450:
>>>     warning: expecting prototype for clk_lucid_pll_configure(). Prototype was for clk_trion_pll_configure() instead
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> Any comments on entire set?
> 
> Please send a cover letter next time. Also they're simply "qcom" related
> but otherwise I'm not sure why they aren't sent to individual subsystem
> lists. They don't depend on each other to build, right?

Indeed, they can go via separate subsystems. I'll split the series in v2.

Best regards,
Krzysztof