[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04837608-8c12-5bc0-9eca-fdcac83c5c4f@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 10:06:09 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radheys@...inx.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
git <git@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] dt-bindings: net: xilinx: document xilinx emaclite
driver binding
On 18/05/2022 17:47, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2022 2:23 PM
>> To: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radheys@...inx.com>; davem@...emloft.net;
>> edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com;
>> robh+dt@...nel.org; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org; Harini Katakam
>> <harinik@...inx.com>
>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; git <git@...inx.com>
>> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] dt-bindings: net: xilinx: document xilinx emaclite
>> driver binding
>>
>> On 12/05/2022 18:39, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
>>> Add basic description for the xilinx emaclite driver DT bindings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/net/xlnx,emaclite.yaml | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/xlnx,emaclite.yaml
>>
>> Why is this RFC? Do you expect DT maintainers review or not? Maybe there is
>> no point for us to review something which is not going to be applied?
>
> I intentionally made it RFC so that all aspects are reviewed as this driver didn't
> had an existing binding. I will send out next version with below comment
> addressed. Thanks!
RFC means you develop something which is not ready, not sure how to do
it, you send an initial idea. Sending a regular bindings as RFC, without
explaining what you expect, is a bit confusing.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists