[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220519110625.wobgihgbtyadgykp@quack3.lan>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 13:06:25 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, paolo.valente@...aro.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
tj@...nel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 6/8] block, bfq: remove dead code for updating
'rq_in_driver'
On Sat 14-05-22 17:05:20, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Such code are not even compiled since they are inside marco "#if 0".
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Sure. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 16 ----------------
> 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index 1d0141c450c0..e36a16684fb4 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -2322,22 +2322,6 @@ static sector_t get_sdist(sector_t last_pos, struct request *rq)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#if 0 /* Still not clear if we can do without next two functions */
> -static void bfq_activate_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
> -{
> - struct bfq_data *bfqd = q->elevator->elevator_data;
> -
> - bfqd->rq_in_driver++;
> -}
> -
> -static void bfq_deactivate_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
> -{
> - struct bfq_data *bfqd = q->elevator->elevator_data;
> -
> - bfqd->rq_in_driver--;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> static void bfq_remove_request(struct request_queue *q,
> struct request *rq)
> {
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists