[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <40FFE5A8-35B9-4707-8D8C-A24254EB9A9B@javigon.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 17:25:46 +0200
From: Javier González <javier@...igon.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Javier González <javier.gonz@...sung.com>,
Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, pankydev8@...il.com,
dsterba@...e.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
jiangbo.365@...edance.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
gost.dev@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] support non power of 2 zoned devices
> On 18 May 2022, at 10.16, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:18:34AM +0200, Javier González wrote:
>> Does the above help you reconsidering your interest in supporting this
>> in NVMe?
>
> Very little. It just seems like a really bad idea.
I understand you don’t like this, but I still hope you see value in supporting it. We are getting close to a very minimal patchset, which is also helping to fix bugs in the zoned stack.
If you take a look at the last version abs give some feedback, I’m sure we can end up with a good solution.
Can you help?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists