linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: tcp: reset 'drop_reason' to NOT_SPCIFIED in tcp_v{4,6}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 May 2022 10:39:24 +0800
From:   Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: tcp: reset 'drop_reason' to
 NOT_SPCIFIED in tcp_v{4,6}_rcv()

On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:18 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 May 2022 19:09:15 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 May 2022 09:46:49 +0800 Menglong Dong wrote:
> > > > This patch is in net, should this fix have been targeting net / 5.18?
> > >
> > > Yeah, I think it should have. What do I need to do? CC someone?
> >
> > Too late now, I was just double checking. It can make its way to the
> > current release via stable in a week or two.
>
> Ah, FWIW my initial question was missing "-next" - I meant to say that
> the patch is in net-next rather than net. I think you got what I meant..

Yeah, I get what you mean now. Such bug-fix patches should target 'net'
rather than 'net-next'.

BTW, thanks for your fixup...I am still surprised at my mistake.