[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWiG4oZbZqFTuWbdYDPnD3mgOTK3vMvS=y-Y6qT4_5nEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 21:32:54 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rrichter@....com,
mingo@...hat.com, mark.rutland@....com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...en8.de,
james.clark@....com, leo.yan@...aro.org, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com, like.xu.linux@...il.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sandipan.das@....com,
ananth.narayan@....com, kim.phillips@....com,
santosh.shukla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] perf tool ibs: Sync amd ibs header file
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 8:56 PM Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 20-May-22 5:18 AM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:45 PM Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com> wrote:
> >>
> >> IBS support has been enhanced with two new features in upcoming uarch:
> >> 1. DataSrc extension and 2. L3 miss filtering. Additional set of bits
> >> has been introduced in IBS registers to exploit these features.
> >> New bits are already defining in arch/x86/ header. Sync it with tools
> >> header file.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
> >> ---
> >> tools/arch/x86/include/asm/amd-ibs.h | 16 ++++++++++------
> >> tools/perf/util/amd-sample-raw.c | 4 ++--
> >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/amd-ibs.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/amd-ibs.h
> >> index 765e9e752d03..9a3312e12e2e 100644
> >> --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/amd-ibs.h
> >> +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/amd-ibs.h
> >> @@ -29,7 +29,10 @@ union ibs_fetch_ctl {
> >> rand_en:1, /* 57: random tagging enable */
> >> fetch_l2_miss:1,/* 58: L2 miss for sampled fetch
> >> * (needs IbsFetchComp) */
> >> - reserved:5; /* 59-63: reserved */
> >> + l3_miss_only:1, /* 59: Collect L3 miss samples only */
> >> + fetch_oc_miss:1,/* 60: Op cache miss for the sampled fetch */
> >> + fetch_l3_miss:1,/* 61: L3 cache miss for the sampled fetch */
> >> + reserved:2; /* 62-63: reserved */
> >> };
> >> };
> >>
> >> @@ -38,14 +41,14 @@ union ibs_op_ctl {
> >> __u64 val;
> >> struct {
> >> __u64 opmaxcnt:16, /* 0-15: periodic op max. count */
> >> - reserved0:1, /* 16: reserved */
> >> + l3_miss_only:1, /* 16: Collect L3 miss samples only */
> >> op_en:1, /* 17: op sampling enable */
> >> op_val:1, /* 18: op sample valid */
> >> cnt_ctl:1, /* 19: periodic op counter control */
> >> opmaxcnt_ext:7, /* 20-26: upper 7 bits of periodic op maximum count */
> >> - reserved1:5, /* 27-31: reserved */
> >> + reserved0:5, /* 27-31: reserved */
> >> opcurcnt:27, /* 32-58: periodic op counter current count */
> >> - reserved2:5; /* 59-63: reserved */
> >> + reserved1:5; /* 59-63: reserved */
> >> };
> >> };
> >>
> >> @@ -71,11 +74,12 @@ union ibs_op_data {
> >> union ibs_op_data2 {
> >> __u64 val;
> >> struct {
> >> - __u64 data_src:3, /* 0-2: data source */
> >> + __u64 data_src_lo:3, /* 0-2: data source low */
> >> reserved0:1, /* 3: reserved */
> >> rmt_node:1, /* 4: destination node */
> >> cache_hit_st:1, /* 5: cache hit state */
> >> - reserved1:57; /* 5-63: reserved */
> >> + data_src_hi:2, /* 6-7: data source high */
> >> + reserved1:56; /* 8-63: reserved */
> >> };
> >> };
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/amd-sample-raw.c b/tools/perf/util/amd-sample-raw.c
> >> index d19d765195c5..3b623ea6ee7e 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/amd-sample-raw.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/amd-sample-raw.c
> >
> > nit: given the commit message this should probably be a separate patch.
>
> Renaming of an existing field in only header file creates a build issue.
> So I had to include it in this patch. Would documenting it in the patch
> description help?
>
> Also rename existing ibs_op_data field "data_src" to "data_src_lo".
>
> Thanks for the review,
> Ravi
Perfect fix. Thanks!
Ian
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> >
> >> @@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ static void pr_ibs_op_data2(union ibs_op_data2 reg)
> >> };
> >>
> >> printf("ibs_op_data2:\t%016llx %sRmtNode %d%s\n", reg.val,
> >> - reg.data_src == 2 ? (reg.cache_hit_st ? "CacheHitSt 1=O-State "
> >> + reg.data_src_lo == 2 ? (reg.cache_hit_st ? "CacheHitSt 1=O-State "
> >> : "CacheHitSt 0=M-state ") : "",
> >> - reg.rmt_node, data_src_str[reg.data_src]);
> >> + reg.rmt_node, data_src_str[reg.data_src_lo]);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static void pr_ibs_op_data3(union ibs_op_data3 reg)
> >> --
> >> 2.27.0
> >>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists