linux-kernel - Re: warning for EOPNOTSUPP vfs_copy_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxizvWk-=JW=s-WXw0OGR3Wjm2YYkpwQqXHc27U=iRtQDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 May 2022 07:39:29 +0300
From:   Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     He Zhe <zhe.he@...driver.com>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com>,
        Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: warning for EOPNOTSUPP vfs_copy_file_range

On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 6:56 AM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:53:15PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>
> > Luis gave up on it, because no maintainer stepped up to take
> > the patch, but I think that is the right way to go.
> >
> > Maybe this bug report can raise awareness to that old patch.
> >
> > Al, could you have a look?
>
> IIRC, you had objections to that variant back then...

Right. But not about the "main" patch.
The patch had an "also" part:

The short-circuit code for the case where the copy length is zero has also
been dropped from the VFS code.  This is because a zero size copy between
two files shall provide a clear indication on whether or not the
filesystem supports non-zero copies.

-     if (len == 0)
-         return 0;
-

Which would have been a regression for nfs client, because
nfs protocol treats length 0 from ->copy_file_range() as "copy everything":

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CAOQ4uxgwcNwWEqYKBg3fMHD3aXOsYUmPeexBe9EVP9Nb53b-Hw@mail.gmail.com/

This api impedance should be fixed in the nfs client, but I'm
not sure if that was already done.

I will test and re-post Luis' patch without removing the short-circuit
unless Luis gets to it first.

BTW, IIRC, there were already LTP tests and man page fixes posted for
the copt_file_range() behavior change.

Thanks,
Amir.