lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB2037623843E2507F7131945A80D39@OSBPR01MB2037.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 May 2022 06:30:15 +0000
From:   "tarumizu.kohei@...itsu.com" <tarumizu.kohei@...itsu.com>
To:     'Greg KH' <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "mchehab+huawei@...nel.org" <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        "eugenis@...gle.com" <eugenis@...gle.com>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "pcc@...gle.com" <pcc@...gle.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "marcos@...a.pet" <marcos@...a.pet>,
        "conor.dooley@...rochip.com" <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        "nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        "marcan@...can.st" <marcan@...can.st>,
        "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 6/8] x86: Add hardware prefetch control support for x86

> As much fun as it is to see a function like this, that is not ok, and never guaranteed
> to keep working, sorry.  Please find the device properly, never assume a specific
> driver model topology as they are guaranteed to break over time and never
> supposed to be static like this.

I will consider a method that does not depend on a specific driver
model topology in the next version.

> How do you know attributes are to be marked read only after init?  Do other parts
> of the kernel do that?  I don't think the driver core guarantees that at all.

I will fix a proper marking in the next version.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ