[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <970aee34-c377-2b8c-c6bb-45e2a96e84b9@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 16:17:45 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>
CC: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"hughd@...gle.com" <hughd@...gle.com>,
"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
"vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
"apopple@...dia.com" <apopple@...dia.com>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"surenb@...gle.com" <surenb@...gle.com>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"rcampbell@...dia.com" <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/shmem: fix infinite loop when swap in shmem
error at swapoff time
On 2022/5/20 14:34, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 08:50:29PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> When swap in shmem error at swapoff time, there would be a infinite loop
>> in the while loop in shmem_unuse_inode(). It's because swapin error is
>> deliberately ignored now and thus info->swapped will never reach 0. So
>> we can't escape the loop in shmem_unuse().
>>
>> In order to fix the issue, swapin_error entry is stored in the mapping
>> when swapin error occurs. So the swapcache page can be freed and the
>> user won't end up with a permanently mounted swap because a sector is
>> bad. If the page is accessed later, the user process will be killed
>> so that corrupted data is never consumed. On the other hand, if the
>> page is never accessed, the user won't even notice it.
>>
>> Reported-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>
> Hi Miaohe,
>
> Thank you for the update. I might miss something, but I still see the same
> problem (I checked it on mm-everything-2022-05-19-00-03 + this patchset).
I was testing this patch on my 5.10 kernel. I reproduced the problem in my env and
fixed it. It seems there might be some critical difference though I checked that by
reviewing the code... Sorry. :(
>
> This patch has the effect to change the return value of shmem_swapin_folio(),
> -EIO (without this patch) to -EEXIST (with this patch).
In fact, I didn't change the return value from -EIO to -EEXIST:
@@ -1762,6 +1799,8 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
failed:
if (!shmem_confirm_swap(mapping, index, swap))
error = -EEXIST;
+ if (error == -EIO)
+ shmem_set_folio_swapin_error(inode, index, folio, swap)
> But shmem_unuse_swap_entries() checks neither, so no change from caller's view point.
> Maybe breaking in errors (rather than ENOMEM) in for loop in shmem_unuse_swap_entries()
> solves the issue? I briefly checked with the below change, then swapoff can return
> with failure.
>
> @@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ static int shmem_unuse_swap_entries(struct inode *inode,
> folio_put(folio);
> ret++;
> }
> - if (error == -ENOMEM)
> + if (error < 0)
> break;
> error = 0;
> }
Yes, this is the simplest and straightforward way to fix the issue. But it has the side effect
that user will end up with a permanently mounted swap just because a sector is bad. That might
be somewhat unacceptable?
>
>> ---
>> mm/shmem.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
>> index d3c7970e0179..d55dd972023a 100644
>> --- a/mm/shmem.c
>> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
>> @@ -1175,6 +1175,10 @@ static int shmem_find_swap_entries(struct address_space *mapping,
>> continue;
>>
>> entry = radix_to_swp_entry(folio);
>> + /*
>> + * swapin error entries can be found in the mapping. But they're
>> + * deliberately ignored here as we've done everything we can do.
>> + */
>> if (swp_type(entry) != type)
>> continue;
>>
>> @@ -1672,6 +1676,36 @@ static int shmem_replace_page(struct page **pagep, gfp_t gfp,
>> return error;
>> }
>>
>> +static void shmem_set_folio_swapin_error(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>> + struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t swap)
>> +{
>> + struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
>> + struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
>> + swp_entry_t swapin_error;
>> + void *old;
>> +
>> + swapin_error = make_swapin_error_entry(&folio->page);
>> + old = xa_cmpxchg_irq(&mapping->i_pages, index,
>> + swp_to_radix_entry(swap),
>> + swp_to_radix_entry(swapin_error), 0);
>> + if (old != swp_to_radix_entry(swap))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + folio_wait_writeback(folio);
>> + delete_from_swap_cache(&folio->page);
>> + spin_lock_irq(&info->lock);
>> + /*
>> + * Don't treat swapin error folio as alloced. Otherwise inode->i_blocks won't
>> + * be 0 when inode is released and thus trigger WARN_ON(inode->i_blocks) in
>> + * shmem_evict_inode.
>> + */
>> + info->alloced--;
>> + info->swapped--;
>> + shmem_recalc_inode(inode);
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&info->lock);
>> + swap_free(swap);
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Swap in the page pointed to by *pagep.
>> * Caller has to make sure that *pagep contains a valid swapped page.
>
> (off-topic a little) BTW, the comment on shmem_swapin_folio() still mentions
> *pagep, but maybe it can be updated to *foliop.
Will do it.
>
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi
Many thanks for comment and test ! :)
>
>> @@ -1695,6 +1729,9 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>> swap = radix_to_swp_entry(*foliop);
>> *foliop = NULL;
>>
>> + if (is_swapin_error_entry(swap))
>> + return -EIO;
>> +
>> /* Look it up and read it in.. */
>> page = lookup_swap_cache(swap, NULL, 0);
>> if (!page) {
>> @@ -1762,6 +1799,8 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>> failed:
>> if (!shmem_confirm_swap(mapping, index, swap))
>> error = -EEXIST;
>> + if (error == -EIO)
>> + shmem_set_folio_swapin_error(inode, index, folio, swap);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists