[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220520095028.rq4ef2o5nwetzog3@quack3>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 11:50:28 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in ext4_writepages
On Thu 19-05-22 16:14:17, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> On 5/19/22 05:23, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Tue 10-05-22 15:28:38, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> > > Syzbot found another BUG in ext4_writepages [1].
> > > This time it complains about inode with inline data.
> > > C reproducer can be found here [2]
> > > I was able to trigger it on 5.18.0-rc6
> > >
> > > [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=a1e89d09bbbcbd5c4cb45db230ee28c822953984
> > > [2] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=ReproC&x=129da6caf00000
> >
> > Thanks for report. This should be fixed by:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220516012752.17241-1-yebin10@huawei.com/
>
>
> In case of the syzbot bug there is something messed up with PAGE DIRTY flags
> and the way syzbot sets up the write. This is what triggers the crash:
Can you tell me where exactly we hit the bug? I've now noticed that this is
on 5.10 kernel and on vanilla 5.10 there's no BUG_ON on line 2753.
> $ ftrace -f ./repro
> ...
> [pid 2395] open("./bus", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_SYNC|O_NOATIME, 000 <unfinished ...>
> [pid 2395] <... open resumed> ) = 6
> ...
> [pid 2395] write(6, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 22 <unfinished ...>
> ...
> [pid 2395] <... write resumed> ) = 22
>
> One way I could fix it was to clear the PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY on the mapping in
> ext4_try_to_write_inline_data() after the page has been updated:
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inline.c b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> index 9c076262770d..e4bbb53fa26f 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inline.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inline.c
> @@ -715,6 +715,7 @@ int ext4_try_to_write_inline_data(struct address_space *mapping,
> put_page(page);
> goto out_up_read;
> }
> + __xa_clear_mark(&mapping->i_pages, 0, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
> }
> ret = 1;
>
> Please let me know it if makes sense any I will send a proper patch.
No, this looks really wrong... We need to better understand what's going
on.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists