[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220520103519.1863-2-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 11:35:16 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] sched/numa: Initialise numa_migrate_retry
On clone, numa_migrate_retry is inherited from the parent which means
that the first NUMA placement of a task is non-deterministic. This
affects when load balancing recognises numa tasks and whether to
migrate "regular", "remote" or "all" tasks between NUMA scheduler
domains.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d4bd299d67ab..867806a57119 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2873,6 +2873,7 @@ void init_numa_balancing(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
p->node_stamp = 0;
p->numa_scan_seq = mm ? mm->numa_scan_seq : 0;
p->numa_scan_period = sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay;
+ p->numa_migrate_retry = 0;
/* Protect against double add, see task_tick_numa and task_numa_work */
p->numa_work.next = &p->numa_work;
p->numa_faults = NULL;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists