[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B6970757-8D00-422E-A8B9-658A4CBAB41D@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 07:04:00 -0400
From: "Benjamin Coddington" <bcodding@...hat.com>
To: "Javier Abrego" <javier.abrego.lorente@...il.com>
Cc: trond.myklebust@...merspace.com, anna@...nel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: removed goto statement
On 20 May 2022, at 4:50, Javier Abrego wrote:
> In this function goto can be replaced. Avoiding goto will improve the
> readability
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Abrego<javier.abrego.lorente@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c b/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
> index e7b34f7e0..9bf3a88fd 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
> @@ -747,21 +747,19 @@ void nfs4_xattr_cache_set_list(struct inode
> *inode, const char *buf,
> return;
>
> entry = nfs4_xattr_alloc_entry(NULL, buf, NULL, buflen);
> - if (entry == NULL)
> - goto out;
> -
> - /*
> - * This is just there to be able to get to bucket->cache,
> - * which is obviously the same for all buckets, so just
> - * use bucket 0.
> - */
> - entry->bucket = &cache->buckets[0];
> -
> - if (!nfs4_xattr_set_listcache(cache, entry))
> - kref_put(&entry->ref, nfs4_xattr_free_entry_cb);
> -
> -out:
> - kref_put(&cache->ref, nfs4_xattr_free_cache_cb);
> + if (entry == NULL) {
> + kref_put(&cache->ref, nfs4_xattr_free_cache_cb);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * This is just there to be able to get to bucket->cache,
> + * which is obviously the same for all buckets, so just
> + * use bucket 0.
> + */
> + entry->bucket = &cache->buckets[0];
> +
> + if (!nfs4_xattr_set_listcache(cache, entry))
> + kref_put(&entry->ref, nfs4_xattr_free_entry_cb);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.25.1
No, NACK because you removed the kref_put of cache->ref. I find this
function quite readable as it is.
Ben
Powered by blists - more mailing lists