[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <165304551793.45439.12289149064085038567.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 12:18:37 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Vsujithkumar.Reddy@....com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc: AjitKumar.Pandey@....com, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@....com,
ajitkumar.pandey@....com, Vijendar.Mukunda@....com,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Revert "ASoC: amd: acp: Set gpio_spkr_en to None for max speaker amplifer in machine driver"
On Mon, 16 May 2022 21:36:09 +0530, V sujith kumar Reddy wrote:
> ASoC: amd : acp : Set Speaker enable/disable pin through rt1019 codec driver.
>
> RT1019 codec has two ways of controlling the en_spkr.
> one way is controlling through gpio pin method the another way is through codec register update through driver.
>
> Now Speaker enable/disable is controlled through codec register updated by codec driver.
> This patch reverts gpio logic.
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/2] Revert "ASoC: amd: acp: Set gpio_spkr_en to None for max speaker amplifer in machine driver"
commit: 6107fb660749507d5e02988151e45884b5423cdc
[2/2] Revert "ASoC: amd: acp: Power on/off the speaker enable gpio pin based on DAPM callback."
commit: 17572892e3beefe68d0875ecfd015eef521c244d
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists