[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YoeKZFXO6zqFaqme@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 09:32:36 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
leo.yan@...aro.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
john.garry@...wei.com, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] perf: arm64: Tools support for Dwarf unwinding
through SVE functions
Em Fri, May 20, 2022 at 12:46:24PM +0100, German Gomez escreveu:
>
> On 17/05/2022 15:58, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:20:01AM +0100, James Clark escreveu:
> >> Changes since v1:
> >>
> >> * Split patchset into kernel side and Perf tool changes
> > Thanks, now I'll wait for the kernel side to be merged.
> >
> > - Arnaldo
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we also need to fix the below import (it's trying to import the
> perf_regs.h from the kernel, not the tools/ dir).
Sure, that is why it is important to do a:
make -C tools/perf build-test
before posting patches, as it will do, among other tests, a detached tarball test using:
⬢[acme@...lbox perf-urgent]$ make help | grep perf
perf-tar-src-pkg - Build perf-5.18.0-rc7.tar source tarball
perf-targz-src-pkg - Build perf-5.18.0-rc7.tar.gz source tarball
perf-tarbz2-src-pkg - Build perf-5.18.0-rc7.tar.bz2 source tarball
perf-tarxz-src-pkg - Build perf-5.18.0-rc7.tar.xz source tarball
perf-tarzst-src-pkg - Build perf-5.18.0-rc7.tar.zst source tarball
⬢[acme@...lbox perf-urgent]$
That will pick just what is in tools/perf/MANIFEST and that doesn´t
include the kernel headers, just what is in tools/ then building with
this patchkit would fail.
To recap:
⬢[acme@...lbox perf-urgent]$ make perf-tarxz-src-pkg
TAR
PERF_VERSION = 5.18.rc7.gc645054ef517
⬢[acme@...lbox perf-urgent]$ ls -la perf-5.18.0-rc7.tar.xz
-rw-r--r--. 1 acme acme 2364832 May 20 09:32 perf-5.18.0-rc7.tar.xz
⬢[acme@...lbox perf-urgent]$ tar tvf perf-5.18.0-rc7.tar.xz | tail
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 7364 2022-05-20 09:32 perf-5.18.0-rc7/tools/perf/util/vdso.c
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 639 2022-05-20 09:32 perf-5.18.0-rc7/tools/perf/util/vdso.h
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 1793 2022-05-20 09:32 perf-5.18.0-rc7/tools/perf/util/zlib.c
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 2672 2022-05-20 09:32 perf-5.18.0-rc7/tools/perf/util/zstd.c
drwxrwxr-x root/root 0 2022-05-20 09:32 perf-5.18.0-rc7/tools/scripts/
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 1091 2022-05-20 09:32 perf-5.18.0-rc7/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 5905 2022-05-20 09:32 perf-5.18.0-rc7/tools/scripts/Makefile.include
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 5288 2022-05-20 09:32 perf-5.18.0-rc7/tools/scripts/utilities.mak
-rw-r--r-- acme/acme 41 2022-05-20 09:32 perf-5.18.0-rc7/HEAD
-rw-r--r-- acme/acme 46 2022-05-20 09:32 perf-5.18.0-rc7/PERF-VERSION-FILE
⬢[acme@...lbox perf-urgent]$
- Arnaldo
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/libunwind/arm64.c b/tools/perf/util/libunwind/arm64.c
> index 15f60fd09424..014d82159656 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/libunwind/arm64.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/libunwind/arm64.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
> #include "unwind.h"
> #include "libunwind-aarch64.h"
> #define perf_event_arm_regs perf_event_arm64_regs
> -#include <../../../../arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h>
> +#include <../../../arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h>
> #undef perf_event_arm_regs
> #include "../../arch/arm64/util/unwind-libunwind.c"
>
--
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists