[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220520124039.228314-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:40:33 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: lee.jones@...aro.org
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
zhiyong.tao@...iatek.com, henryc.chen@...iatek.com,
johnson.wang@...iatek.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] soc: mediatek: pwrap: Move PMIC read test sequence in function
The PMIC read test is performed in two places: pwrap_init_dual_io()
and pwrap_init_sidly().
In preparation for adding support for PMICs requiring a companion
part, move this sequence to a new function pwrap_pmic_read_test().
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
---
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
index d8cb0f833645..d0c79ee4c56b 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
@@ -1390,6 +1390,18 @@ static int pwrap_regmap_write(void *context, u32 adr, u32 wdata)
return pwrap_write(context, adr, wdata);
}
+static bool pwrap_pmic_read_test(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, const u32 *dew_regs,
+ u16 read_test_val)
+{
+ bool is_success;
+ u32 rdata;
+
+ pwrap_read(wrp, dew_regs[PWRAP_DEW_READ_TEST], &rdata);
+ is_success = ((rdata & U16_MAX) == read_test_val);
+
+ return is_success;
+}
+
static int pwrap_reset_spislave(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
{
bool tmp;
@@ -1433,18 +1445,18 @@ static int pwrap_reset_spislave(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
*/
static int pwrap_init_sidly(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
{
- u32 rdata;
u32 i;
u32 pass = 0;
+ bool read_ok;
signed char dly[16] = {
-1, 0, 1, 0, 2, -1, 1, 1, 3, -1, -1, -1, 3, -1, 2, 1
};
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
pwrap_writel(wrp, i, PWRAP_SIDLY);
- pwrap_read(wrp, wrp->slave->dew_regs[PWRAP_DEW_READ_TEST],
- &rdata);
- if (rdata == PWRAP_DEW_READ_TEST_VAL) {
+ read_ok = pwrap_pmic_read_test(wrp, wrp->slave->dew_regs,
+ PWRAP_DEW_READ_TEST_VAL);
+ if (read_ok) {
dev_dbg(wrp->dev, "[Read Test] pass, SIDLY=%x\n", i);
pass |= 1 << i;
}
@@ -1464,8 +1476,7 @@ static int pwrap_init_sidly(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
static int pwrap_init_dual_io(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
{
int ret;
- bool tmp;
- u32 rdata;
+ bool read_ok, tmp;
/* Enable dual IO mode */
pwrap_write(wrp, wrp->slave->dew_regs[PWRAP_DEW_DIO_EN], 1);
@@ -1481,12 +1492,9 @@ static int pwrap_init_dual_io(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_DIO_EN);
/* Read Test */
- pwrap_read(wrp,
- wrp->slave->dew_regs[PWRAP_DEW_READ_TEST], &rdata);
- if (rdata != PWRAP_DEW_READ_TEST_VAL) {
- dev_err(wrp->dev,
- "Read failed on DIO mode: 0x%04x!=0x%04x\n",
- PWRAP_DEW_READ_TEST_VAL, rdata);
+ read_ok = pwrap_pmic_read_test(wrp, wrp->slave->dew_regs, PWRAP_DEW_READ_TEST_VAL);
+ if (!read_ok) {
+ dev_err(wrp->dev, "Read failed on DIO mode.\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists