[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220520125819.GS2578@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:58:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
frederic@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 9/9] arch/idle: Change arch_cpu_idle() IRQ behaviour
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 01:13:22PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> So you want to call call the HLT hypercall with .irq_disabled=false and
> .do_sti=false, but actual RFLAGS.IF in the guest is 0 and avoid CLI on
> wake up expecting it to be cleared already, right?
Yep, just like MWAIT can, avoids pointless IF flipping.
> My reading of the spec is "don't do that". But actual behaviour is up to
> VMM and TDX module implementation. VMM doens't have access to the guest
> register file, so it *may* work, I donno.
Yeah, it totally *can* work, but I've no idea if they done the right
thing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists